Procedural Due process of law, limits the procedur

es that may be usedby government when interfering with life, liberty, or property. The
constitution provides a number of due process rights in amendments four
through eight. Due process is a very important factor in a free society.

Without these restrictions on the powers of law enforcement agencies and
courts, innocent people would be deprived of very important rights with no
cause. The English law developed the right to a “speedy and public trial.”
The Magna Carta helped establish this right and in the centuries that
followed this developed to include trial by jury. A lot of the rights
guaranteed to us by the constitution were adopted from the English law. Due
process rights are divided into three parts, before a person is accused,
during trial, and after sentencing.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Before a person is accused of a crime, in order to find evidence the
police usually searches the individual’s property and or body, then what
ever evidence is found the police seizes to use during trial. The police
must have a warrant to search and seize anything. To obtain that warrant
the police must go to a judge and she or he must sign the warrant. If a law
enforcement agent is present in a room where an arrest is being made and
sees something incriminating in plain view he or she may seize it to use in
the court. Also an accused has the right to remain silent and to have a
lawyer present during the police interrogation, if the individual cannot
afford a lawyer one will be provided for him, also the accused must be
informed that anything he or she say could be used against him or her
during trial. The suspect must be informed of all the aforementioned
rights; those are referred to as Miranda rights. While being held in
custody, an accused must know the reason for being held (habeas corpus) and
he or she may not be punished or tortured to answer questions (cruel and
unusual punishment.)
The Constitution protects an accused person’s rights while he or she
is on trial. An individual deserves a trial as soon as it is requested and
may not be held in jail for a long period of time if a speedy trial is
requested. A trial may not be secret, if the government wants to try you
they must do so open to the public and there must be a public record of the
proceedings. The jury, one is tried before must be impartial. The trial
must take place in the state, district, or community the crime was
committed. If it is proven the community might be prejudiced the trial may
be moved to a different location. You must be informed of charges brought
against you. You have the right to confront the witnesses against you and
no testimonies of secret witnesses may be presented in court. You may have
your own witnesses present, if they do not wish to appear at the trial, the
court will force them to do so. And the most important one is the
government can’t prevent you from having a lawyer to defend you. After you
have been sentenced you may appeal to a higher court. The government may
not try you for the same crime twice (double jeopardy).

Throughout the years many cases have reached the Supreme Court
regarding Due Process of law. Cases such as Escobedo v. Illinois, Gideon v.

Wainwright, Mapp v. Ohio and Powell v. Alabama are perfect examples. In
Escobedo’s case the Supreme Court held that the denial of Escobedo’s right
to counsel and the failure to inform him of his right to remain silent was
unconstitutional. In Gideon’s case the Court ruled that all states must
provide an attorney in all felony and capital cases for people who cannot
afford one themselves. In Mapp’s case, it was decided that Mapp’s fourth
amendment right to be secure from search and seizure was violated. In
Powell’s case, the Supreme Court determined “that because the defendants
were ignorant, illiterate, and young; surrounded by public hostility; under
close surveillance by the military and in deadly peril of their lives; the
failure of the trial court to give them reasonable time and opportunity to
secure counsel and prepare for trial was a clear denial of due process.”
Every person’s rights to due process are very important and the
framers of the constitution realized this from their experience with a
different type of government and from their past. All branches of
government are limited by the due process laws. The constitution restricts
the government’s power and assures that every person is guaranteed a fair
process of law.