Macbeth

Macbeth: Blood
Macbeth: Blood I am going to prove that in the play Macbeth, a symbol of blood is portrayed often(and with different meanings), and that it is a symbol that is develope
2. Lady Macbeth: A Wife In Support Of Her Husband
Lady Macbeth: A Wife in Support of Her Husband One of the main characters in Macbeth, Lady Macbeth, has been an object of intense criticism. Although sometimes regarded
3. Macbeth: Macbeth’s Decent Into Hell
Macbeth: Macbeth’s Decent Into Hell Macbeth is a play by William Shakespeare. Macbeth is a man who commits a series of crimes because of persuation from his wife that will
4. Macbeth: A Mature Man Of Established Character
Macbeth: A Mature Man of Established Character Macbeth is presented as a mature man of definitely established character, successful in certain fields of activity and en
5. Macbeth: Aristotelian Tragedy
Macbeth: Aristotelian Tragedy Kim Blair Per.5 Interpretive Test The definition of tragedy in an excerpt from Aristotle’s “Poetics” is the re-creation, complete withi
6. Macbeth: Ambition Is Root Of All Evil
Macbeth: Ambition is Root of All Evil It is said that ambition is the key to success. In the case of Shakespeare’s Macbeth, it is the key to his downfall. He is presented w
7. Macbeth: Appearance Vs Reality
Macbeth: Appearance vs Reality Brooke Soper The way people act on the outside and who they really are on the inside may be two totally different things. Some may change
8. Macbeth: A Tale Of Two Theories
Macbeth: A Tale of Two Theories Macbeth(c.1607), written by William Shakespeare, is the tragic tale of Macbeth, a virtuous man, corrupted by power and greed. This tragedy co
9. Macbeth: Banquo’s Soliloquy
Macbeth: Banquo’s Soliloquy John Spitzer In Macbeth, a play by William Shakespeare, Banquo’s soliloquy at the beginning of the third act explains some of his present feelin
10. Captain’s Letter Regarding Macbeth
Captain’s Letter Regarding Macbeth Dear Family: I beg forgiveness for the prolonged period of silence previous to this letter. It had been difficult to write during our b
11. Macbeth: A Tale Of Two Theories
Macbeth: A Tale of Two Theories Macbeth(c.1607), written by William Shakespeare, is the tragic tale of Macbeth, a virtuous man, corrupted by power and greed. This taged
12. Macbeth: Character Analysis Of Macbeth
Macbeth: Character Analysis of Macbeth Macbeth was a true Shakespearean tragic hero. He had many noble qualities as well as several tragic flaws. He was a courageous, brave
Words
/ Pages : 414 / 24

Macbeth

Macbeth 1) Early in Macbeth we see Lady Macbeth as the strong, rational, determined, ambitious, even ruthless woman ; on the other hand we see a more vacillating , fearful Macbeth. As the play progresses, we see both characters change. Discuss. In the play Macbeth we can see a change occur in both the charaters, I think that most of the change in the characters occurs when they decide to actualy go ahead with the murder of Duncan. After this murder takes place both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth seem to become in a way blood thirsty. Not for their enjoyment but for the sake of Macbeth to to become the ruler.

The seem to get carried away with all the murders that they have made take place. And go on a killing war path, killing anyone who gets in the way of Macbeth recieving the throne. It is just before the scene where Macbeth kills Duncan where the first sign of Macbeth changing occurs, he becomes all agitated and hesitant towards whether he should kill King Duncan or not, but finally Lady Macbet persuades Macbeth into commiting the murder of Duncan. But before the murder you could somehow already see the stress building up on top of him. It was the forceful words of his wife Lady Macbeth that I think made him do it.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Lady Macbeth before the murder was quite calm as her ussual self giving orders to Macbeth. After the murder of Duncan this is when you see most of the changes begin, first of all it all started with Macbeth he started to become nervous and began to see things that wernt really there like the ghost of Duncan. I think this was the whole beginning of the couples problems when Macbeth started seeing things, I think this was what started Lady Macbeth off. This I think got her a bit paranoid about ghosts and other spirits comming to get her this was when you could start to notice a difference in Lady Macbeths attitude. I think it was partly because she was a bit worried about Macbeth and his problems with his seeing things.

What caused more problems for the Macbeth couple I think was that they killed more people to give his crown so called fruits for the rest of his life realy just to keep it secure. After all the killings that Macbeth had done both Macbeth anf Lady Macbeth realy lost it they ssaught of went of the rails and become realy sick in the mind. Lady Macbeth realy changed in her personality side of things her whole attitude to life had changed after all the murders that took place. So in coclution I think that both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth realy changed towards the end of the play. There whole personality changed.

Instead of Lady Macbeth being strong, determined and ruthless she has become frail minded and scared of what was to come of her life, and instead of Macbeth being fearless he had also become scared and had fallen of the rails his whole life had become fearful. So I would have to say in the end they had definatly chaged there ways since the begining of the play. 1) Early in Macbeth we see Lady Macbeth as the strong, rational, determined, ambitious, even ruthless woman ; on the other hand we see a more vacillating , fearful Macbeth. As the play progresses, we see both characters change. Discuss. In the play Macbeth we can see a change occur in both the charaters, I think that most of the change in the characters occurs when they decide to actualy go ahead with the murder of Duncan.

After this murder takes place both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth seem to become in a way blood thirsty. Not for their enjoyment but for the sake of Macbeth to to become the ruler. The seem to get carried away with all the murders that they have made take place. And go on a killing war path, killing anyone who gets in the way of Macbeth recieving the throne. It is just before the scene where Macbeth kills Duncan where the first sign of Macbeth changing occurs, he becomes all agitated and hesitant towards whether he should kill King Duncan or not, but finally Lady Macbet persuades Macbeth into commiting the murder of Duncan.

But before the murder you could somehow already see the stress building up on top of him. It was the forceful words of his wife Lady Macbeth that I think made him do it. Lady Macbeth before the murder was quite calm as her ussual self giving orders to Macbeth. After the murder of Duncan this is when you see most of the changes begin, first of all it all started with Macbeth he started to become nervous and began to see things that wernt really there like the ghost of Duncan. I think this was the whole beginning of the couples problems when Macbeth started seeing things, I think this was what started Lady Macbeth off.

This I think got her a bit paranoid about ghosts and other spirits comming to get her this was when you could start to notice a difference in Lady Macbeths attitude. I think it was partly because she was a bit worried about Macbeth and his problems with his seeing things. What caused more problems for the Macbeth couple I think was that they killed more people to give his crown so called fruits for the rest of his life realy just to keep it secure. After all the killings that Macbeth had done both Macbeth anf Lady Macbeth realy lost it they ssaught of went of the rails and become realy sick in the mind. Lady Macbeth realy changed in her personality side of things her whole attitude to life had changed after all the murders that took place.

So in coclution I think that both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth realy changed towards the end of the play. There whole personality changed. Instead of Lady Macbeth being strong, determined and ruthless she has become frail minded and scared of what was to come of her life, and instead of Macbeth being fearless he had also become scared and had fallen of the rails his whole life had become fearful. So I would have to say in the end they had definatly changed there ways since the begining of the play.

Macbeth

.. y, she kept getting worse. Toward the end of the play she was sleep walking, pretending to wash her hands, trying to get the blood the Duncan off of her. When Macbeth asked the Doctor to heal her, he replied that because she was sick in the head, she had to heal herself. Then, shortly after, Lady Macbeth killed herself.

It is obvious that the murder of Duncan was emotionally to distressing for Lady Macbeth to handle. The murder of Duncan in Macbeth’s eyes, I believe, was kind of an awakening of his evil capabilities. Soon after the murder, Macbeth and his wife switched their personalities. Where Macbeth was scared and distressed before the murder, he was willing and eager to kill again very soon after. By killing Duncan, Macbeth slowly started eating away at any goodness he had left in him.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

He was soon so evil that he ordered his friend Banquo and his son murdered. With these new killing fresh in his mind, he decided to cross the boundary into the realm of completely satanic behavior when he had Macduff’s family slain. It is clear that by simply murdering Duncan, Macbeth was able to set free all the evil urges he had inside of him, and thus, wreak evil havoc on all of Scotland. When Macbeth and his wife decided to kill Duncan, I do not think they had a clue it would transform their entire moral and psychological well-being. For Lady Macbeth, she went from being the instigator to simply becoming a recluse that could not control her guilt.

It was directly opposite for Macbeth. Before the murder, he was kind and very slow to come around to deciding to kill. Soon after though, he would hardly think twice before ordering more death brought to his land. Shakespeare showed us how powerful murder can be. Macbeth and his wife, I feel, were the two most important characters in the play. Their two personalities worked together to perform deeds that one or the other could not have done alone. Their actions shaped the remainder of the play and also changed their supporting characters’ lives. Without his wife behind him, Macbeth would not have become the king of Scotland. It was his idea to murder Duncan, but he could not have done it without his wife’s guidance.

Macbeth was too nice to commit the murder alone, and his wife knew just what to say and do to get Macbeth the courage to change his life. At the beginning of the play, Macbeth and his wife form one of the most powerful duos in history. Throughout the play though, this all changes. Macbeth no longer needs the extra nudge from his wife to be able to put a life under the knife, and his wife, in return, is slowly becoming quiet and shameful. She is still a great help to Macbeth though.

When he sees Banquo’s ghost, she covers for him by saying that he is having another one of his headaches, and smoothly excuses the guests so Macbeth can get some rest. Without his wife at his side, I feel that Macbeth would not have been able to handle all he had going on in his life at the time. As the story progresses, we can see an even greater change in Macbeth and his wife. Macbeth is a full blown murderous psycho, and his wife is sleep- walking and having guilt-fed hallucinations. At the stage in the play where the doctor and Lady Macbeth’s servant see one of her fits, it signals the emergence of a new role for her. She is no longer her husband’s right hand, but she is instead her husband’s guilty conscience.

Macbeth is busy trying to keep Scotland from falling apart, so he has no time to feel guilt and repent his sins. His wife, I feel, has somehow become a vent for all the guilt that Macbeth refuses to identify that he has. She has somehow taken all of Macbeth’s guilt and made it her own. By becoming a vent for all of his guilt, Lady Macbeth is giving her husband the clear mind he needs to desperately cling to his failing country. It is said that behind every great man, there is a great woman.

In Macbeth’s case, this is definitely true. Now, Macbeth might not be what we would consider to be a great man, but his wife was surely used as both a catalyst and a crutch throughout the duration of the play. Without her, the play Macbeth would not even be worth studying. Throughout the course of the play, Macbeth had a lot of important decisions to make, as well as a number of outside forces contributing to his decisions. His fate, his conscience, his wife, and the witches were all important forces acting on him. In my opinion though, Macbeth was not affected by his fate, but it was his own free will that caused it.

From the opening scene of the play, the witches were already a part of the story. They informed Macbeth of his new title and then foretold him a surprising future. They told Macbeth that he would be king. This was a very open ended statement though. In no way did they tell Macbeth how he would become king, or how he should become king.

They simply told him that it was going to happen. Using this information, Macbeth then took his life into his own hands when he decided, along with the help of his wife, to kill Duncan. This single action changed the course of his life and thus, changed what some would call his fate. Besides the fact that Macbeth decided his own future by killing Duncan instead of waiting to see what would happen, the witches even told us that it had to be Macbeth’s own will that would drive him over to the dark side. The witches told us the story of how they were going to punish the fat woman by tossing her husband’s ship about the sea, denying him any time to rest.

They could not reach out directly and kill him, but they could punish his soul and his emotions. This is an example of what they are doing to Macbeth. They are punishing him, leaving him to wonder how, or even if, he will in fact become king. The witches did not put a spell on Macbeth to make him kill, they just stimulated his emotions and raised a questions deep within his soul that caused him to take action into his own hands and commit the life altering murder. There are many different paths in life that can lead to the same place.

Many people would explain that is a person’s fate. In some instances this may be true, but with Macbeth, I feel that it was his own actions and decisions along those paths that altered his final destination.

MACBETH

The use of the Classical Tragic Mold in character development
In Shakespeare’s tragedy, Macbeth, there are many characters. Only one character stands out, and his name is in the title of the play. Macbeth’s character was made in the mold of the ancient Greek tragic hero. Besides being endowed by Shakespeare with an abundance and variety of potential traits and characteristics, Macbeth also follows the Classical Tragic Mold, which is presented with a hefty supply of hubris, and in this case, ambition. Because Macbeth follows the Classical Tragic Mold, he is a Classical Tragic Hero.

The first step of the Classical Tragic Mold is recognizing the problem. The problem in Macbeth is not a true problem that presents itself outwardly. The problem for the character of Macbeth is deciding if he should listen to his ambition and kill Duncan. At first, he ponders reasons why not to kill his king. He at first thinks that he cannot kill him because of four reasons: Macbeth is Duncan’s subject, Duncan is a good king, they are blood-related, and Macbeth is his host. These reasons dissuade Macbeth at first, but later Lady Macbeth convinces him, by questioning his manhood, to commit the dastardly crime. When he finally murders Duncan, the problem comes to closure. But, even long before then, the next step in the mold had begun: the descent into the abyss.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The “decent into the abyss” is the second step in the Classical Tragic Mold. It is started with Macbeth’s second soliloquy. This is after Macbeth hears from Duncan that Malcolm was to be named the Prince of Cumberland. “The Prince of Cumberland! That is a step on which I must fall down, or else o’erleap, for in my way it lies … Let not light see my black and deep desires.” (Shakespeare, 281). This quote from the soliloquy indicates that Macbeth has, indeed, told himself that he will commit the murder of Duncan, although he doesn’t actually admit it until his wife pressures him to do so. With this decision, the reader (or audience) reads (or sees) that Macbeth is straying from the righteous path, and descending into the abyss, even though he is keeping his feelings to himself. His decision to murder Duncan tarnishes his “war hero” image and casts it in an ominous shadow.

The third step in the mold has two parts and is known as Transformation and Transcendence. The character of Macbeth goes into Transformation during his fourth soliloquy. “…I have lived long enough. My way of life is fall’n into the sear…” (Shakespeare, 343). This quote illustrates that Macbeth begins to realize that his life has fallen into a wretched state and that either the battle will dethrone him or make him invincible. His character has transformed from an ambitious, power-hungry man, to one who knows that either his end or glorification may be near, and will fight his hardest to try to keep himself alive, even if it means helping the sinister process along by failing in his cause.

The second part of this step is Transcendence. When a character finally meets with this step, he or she becomes a universal character. Macbeth states, “…Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player… upon the stage… It is a tale told by an idiot… signifying nothing.” (Shakespeare, 346). In this soliloquy, Shakespeare turns Macbeth into a universal character by claiming that people are like actors on a stage. It doesn’t matter what they do because it is just a play, and no one’s actions will truly effect anything.

The substance of Macbeth is that of which Classical Tragic Heroes are fashioned. Because he follows the mold well, Macbeth is an excellent example of why the Greek rules of the theatre are still used as the basis of many plays today, as well as back in the age of Shakespeare. The Classical Tragic Mold is used to shape a tragic hero into a character that can be repeated over and over, in countless plays and more. Macbeth was developed in this way, using this mold.

Macbeth

Macbeth
From the beginning of the story , Lady Macbeth encourages
her Husband to do what he must to gain te throne. That I may pour my spirts in thine ear chastise with the valor of my tongue all that impedes thee from the golden round(339). Now with her wicked thoughts of her so loved husband.

However, do they really think that Macbeth would have committed this murder if his wife haith not been at his ear? Can they really think that he would have been able to kill the king if his wife had not been at his side? Lady Macbeth seems fears and fearless with the attitude that she carries on, but as the story goes on her attitude goes for a spin she has now turned her attitude into worry and panic.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Lady Macbeth seems a bit crazy because of the way she speaks. It seems as she has no fears. Come, you spirt that tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here, and fill me, from the crown to the toe, top-full of desire cruelty! Make thick my blood; stop up the access and passage to remors.(340) She calls on evil to fill her heart and soul with evil. No other way will she accomplish what she must . She asks for strength to commit such a crime. How far will one go to have what its heart desires. At this point Lady Macbeth is willing to make her husband risk it all for the throne. She prepares her husband for the crime. Lady Macbeth wants her husband to kill the king and while Macbeth is having second thoughts about this. She once again pushes him to do what he must to gain the power he so desires. Lady Macbeth then call him a coward for not wanting to go through with the plan and she goes crazy once again.

Words
/ Pages : 313 / 24

Macbeth

MacBeth
Everyone who is mortal has at least one flaw. Some are more serious than others. For example, some people have addictions to gambling, while other people can’t remember to put the milk away after they use it. Sooner or later a person’s imperfections will come back to haunt them. In the tragedy MacBeth, this premise comes to life. In the play of McBeth, many of the main characters pass away. The reason the characters die is because these characters have flaws, which will eventually lead to their downfall. Not every character is deserving of this destiny. Some characters have minor flaws, which shouldn’t lead to their deaths. But, other characters have a major flaws, which is would eventually lead them to their deaths.
MacBeth kills the first Thane of Cawdor, for trying to lead a revolution against England. His fatal flaw was that he was according to Ross, a disloyal traitor. The Thane of Cawdor was greedy, who wanted the throne of England for himself, and as a result was murdered. His murder wasn’t really depressing because the Thane of Cawdor deserved his fate. He was leading a battle, in which many lost their lives, for the sake of greed, and he deserved to die because of his flaw.

Duncan was the King of England, and was murdered by MacBeth. He was murdered, because in order for MacBeth to fulfill his plan and become King, Duncan would have to die. Duncan’s fatal flaw was that he was too trusting. For example, he thought that none of his friends could really be enemies. If Duncan was more careful about his safety at MacBeth’s castle, he may have had a chance to survive. But, Duncan’s flaw wasn’t something so
horrible that he should have die. Most people need to trust each other more, and just because one person did, he shouldn’t have to die.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

MacBeth also killed MacBeths former best friend, Banquo. Banquo was killed, because he knew too much about the murder of Duncan. But, that was not his fatal flaw! Banquo’s fatal flaw was that although he knew that MacBeth killed Duncan, he really didn’t do anything about it. There were many opportunities where Banquo could tell someone such as MacDuff what he thought about the murders. Banquo didn’t deserve death, just because he didn’t act quickly in telling someone that MacBeth killed Duncan. Banquo knew that if he said anything, no one would believe him, and he would be executed.

Lady MacBeth is MacBeth’s wife. She is his coconspirator in killing Duncan. Although she helps MacBeth get the courage to commit the murder, she isn’t willing to do it herself. She uses the excuse that Duncan looked too much like her father. Unlike MacBeth though, it is harder for Lady MacBeth to live with the fact that she helped cause the murder of the King. And in the end, it makes her so crazy that she commits suicide. Whether or not Lady MacBeth deserved her fate is a tricky question. Although she did encourage MacBeth to murder Duncan, she feels regret for her action. Also, she realized what she did was wrong. But in my opinion, she realized it a little too late, and Duncan was still dead so she did deserve her fate.

MacBeth was the focus of the entire play, and that’s why it was named after him. All of the problems start when he murder’s Duncan. He commits the murder because of his fatal flaw, he is too ambitious. If he werent so ambitious and determined to be king, then he would never have killed Duncan. And if MacBeth didn’t kill Duncan none of the other characters would die. MacBeth deserved his fate more than any other characters in the
Play. He did many things wrong. First he killed Duncan, and then he killed Banquo. After that, MacBeth killed MacDuff’s family. Worst of all, MacBeth disturbed the balance of nature. Also, MacBeth didn’t feel any remorse until he was faced with death. If MacBeth just waited for his time, he would have been king, and have had a chance to enjoy it.

Every character that died in MacBeth had one fatal flaw. Thane of Cawdor was a traitor. Duncan was too trusting. Banquo didn’t do anything about the knowledge he had. Lady MacBeth helped plot the murder of Duncan. MacBeth, destroyed the natural order and harmony of nature. But, not all of the characters that died
deserved to die because of their flaws. Duncan shouldn’t have been punished for trusting someone, and Banquo would have said something, but was waiting for the right time or some physical evidence. But, if MacBeth hadn’t been so ambitious, none of the problems that occurred would have.


English Essays

Macbeth

Macbeth Macbeth is the epitome of what the literary world regards a “tragic hero”. His admirable qualities are supplanted with greed and hate when he is duped by the three witches. Thunder and lightning. Enter three Witches. Yes, it is the first scene from William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, a tragic tale of one man’s quest for power and his ultimate defeat. The story revolves around our tragic hero, Macbeth, and how an admirable and noble man, so established in society, can fall so greatly.

Throughout the play, he is driven by an obsession to become King of Scotland, and in the process commits acts of betrayal and treachery to achieve this goal. However, Macbeth is not the only character involved in this sordid affair. His wife, the manipulative Lady Macbeth, three prophetic witches and members of the Scottish aristocracy all play pivotal in the drama. Lady Macbeth, the great woman behind the man, plots, scheme and propels Macbeth into a nightmare of falsehood and guilt. The wiches, or weird sisters, embody the supernatural element of this tragedy. With their imperfect predictions and calculated duplicity, they created chaos in Macbeth’s mind as they toy wit! h his sense of security. The Scottish aristocracy comprises of King Duncan, the two princes – Malcolm and Donalbain, and various other thanes and nobles, including Macbeth’s friend Banquo.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

They serve as barriers for Macbeth and, regardless of friend or foe, he chooses to either “fall down, or else o’er-leap” these hurdles. However, one hurdle that proves too great is his nemesis: Macduff. After Macbeth’s false sense of security is shattered, a mighty swipe of Macduff’s sword releases Macbeth from a tangled web of desire, design and deceit. Macbeth has, as his wife says, the milk of human kindness (which was not a cliche when the play was written), the kind of affection that many people have for others when self-interest is not rampant. He has a high regard for Duncan and Banquo, defaming the latter only once (III.i.74 ff.). He differs from Duncan in this regard in that the King’s charity is of a quality that works to transform human society into a family and that, as G.

R. Elliott points out, “makes the spirit of Duncan persist through the play after his death.” Nevertheless, Macbeth shares in a somewhat limited way in the moral nature of manhood as seen in I.vii.46-47, as E. M. Waith observes, without wanting to contract himself at the urgings of his wife into a paragon of energy, energy simply devoted to utterly selfish ends. Macbeth thus differs from Macduff, who more fully realizes both the valorous and moral nature of manhood, and from Richard III, who is a melodramatic villain and indeed a scourge of God. Macbeth, unlike Richard, is not completely hardened even at the end of the play.

He exhibits remorse immediately after the murder of Duncan, and he repeatedly displays anguish after commission of his atrocities. In proposing the savage murder of Macduff’s family, he speaks of these “unfortunate” souls (IV.i.152) without attaching irony or sadism to this adjective. The passage “I have lived long enough” (V.iii.22-28) is not, in its apprehension of the failure of a life, the utterance of a thorough reprobate like Richard; and “poor heart” (V.iii.28) is analogous to “unfortunate souls.” Macbeth, unlike Richard, is self- tortured and thus wins of us a degree of sympathy. Macbeth is utterly free from Richard’s savage humor as seen, for example, in his jesting about sending Clarence to Heaven post-post-haste. Unlike Iago, Macbeth is unequipped with a philosophy of egoism. Unlike Lady Macbeth, he does not pray to have his nature altered.

He makes no formal compact, as Faustus does, with the Devil. He never chastises his wife for her failure to bear sons though his ambition is dynastic rather than personal, and even though, whatever Renaissance medical theory may have taught, royal practice as observable in the reign of Henry VIII held the wife rather than the husband to blame for lack of issue. Although there is slight evidence that Macbeth uses Lady Macbeth not to form his murderous intent toward Duncan but to give him courage and practical insight into the way this piece of regicide may be committed, he vacillates before the murder of Duncan (I.vii.1ff.), he experiences hallucinations that precede (II.i.33-35) and follow (II.ii.35-36) this murder; he is unable to answer “amen” to “God bless us” (II.ii.23 ff.); he feels remorse in II.ii.60 ff.; and his later savagery suggests the utter subversion of his nature. Macbeth is not sufficiently cultivated in good or evil to muster poise for all occasions: thus he experiences difficulty in sleeping; he uses rhetoric badly in the presence of others when disturbed (I.iv) and even resorts to improbability (e.g., I.iii.149-150); he cannot reproduce imperial dignity and the graces of kingship as Claudius, Hamlet’s stepfather, manages to do. So he must act, and so he stays the onset of madness, acquiring firmness of purpose in the wrong road. Even his soliloquies, notable for magniloquence and phantasmagoria and marked by voluptuous word-painting, show more the stages of his corruption than its causes – the need for action to cover his lack of poise in awaiting developments and the need to stifle the moral imagination that enables him to foresee the consequences of his actions. Macbeth’s fall from grace into sheer misery is truly tragic in its nature.

Consequently, he was simply a weak soul that was unfairly hoaxed.

x

Hi!
I'm Adrienne!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out