Inherit The Wind

Inherit the Wind
The play Inherit the Wind was written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee to inform its readers about the injustice of a law that limited the freedom of an ordinary citizen. This play is based upon the upon actual events that happened to an individual, John Scopes, in Dayton, Tennessee during the 1920s. This famous Monkey Trial not only allowed people to begin to accept new theories about the origin of man, but also showed that they did not have to limit themselves in other areas of life. The two authors were passionate about this theme for the play and obviously researched the history of the actual trial, in order to portray it as realistically as possible. This hard work and attention to detail created a very informative and memorable play. The authors choose to present this story in play format so that the characters words and actions could be effectively expressed. This format also allowed the story to be conveyed without any bias to either side. It is in this way that the authors allow each side of the case to speak their minds freely.

The main source for Lee and Lawrences information was the actual trial record found in Dayton, Tennessee, dating back to 1925. They did not use all of the characters or dialogue from the records, instead they elaborated on the actual people and events, also using reporters stories on the case. The authors placed intriguing characters within the play to make the storys events unfold more readily and the become more interesting. The book shows the reader how closed minded that these characters can be when it comes to a new, different idea. This is a valuable book because it teaches its readers to respect the thoughts and beliefs of others, even though they may oppose them.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

In the beginning of the play, the authors try to lead us into the topic of Darwinism versus Creationism. One instance was when the character Howard actually told Melinda Your old mans a monkey! The audience also learns that the accused lawbreaker, Bert Cates, and the reverends daughter, Rachel Brown, are in love and are set to be married. Rachel becomes a pertinent part of the trial when Brady starts to question her, against the will of Bert. Brady later shatters Rachels trust in him by putting words in her mouth and trying to make her sound as if she is turning against Bert. Rachel is extremely upset over this happenstance and blames herself for the guilty verdict that is later placed upon her fiancee. The trial takes a great toll on Brady, eventually leading to his death at the end of the play. Drummonds playful, yet intelligent interrogation of Brady took a rapid turn, going from Brady strutting about the Bible to demoralizing Mr. Brady himself. There are many different reasons for his death, some of which include the incredible stress of the trial (Brady: Mother. Theyre laughing at me, Mother! I cant stand it when they laugh at me!) and the heat of the courtroom (On a few occasions the Judge actually dismisses court due to the excessive temperature). Bradys death seems to signify that the battle that faces Bert Cates has a chance that is may work out. Even with this turning point, Drummond knew that his cause was futile in the town that the trial was held. He knew that it had to be taken to a higher power, the State Supreme Court.

Inherit the Wind

Are You A Man or
A Monkey ?
A Disturbing Movement of
Anti-Intellectualism in America
“Its more valuable to see with the eye in ones heart,
rather than see with the eye in ones head.”
The epic crusade of science and technology versus theology, both
religions of sorts dating back in time more years than any of us can begin to
comprehend. Maybe that is why, as a whole, we have such a difficult time
discerning between the two, or rather, why we fail to see clearly the true
meaning that lies behind the propaganda of either.
The arguments on either side are significant and carry as much reason
and weight as the other. Thus, we simply cannot refuse to make a judgment
before looking critically into the logistics surrounding the propaganda of each
theory. Gods diplomats, the Bible-thumping, prophesizing blow-hards much
like Brady in Inherit the Wind, are as much the bigoted and biased,
sacrilegious and amoral attention-seekers as they proclaim the evolutionists to
be. However, their chosen doctrine cannot be overlooked, as I myself am
deeply devoted to its teachings. Brady and others like him fight from the
backbone of Faith. I dont believe in the literal deciphering of the Bible, but
that it is a book of ideals that we must trust in its veracity. It isnt meant to be explained!
Ironically, the thing that people are the most hungry for, meaning, is the one thing that science hasnt been able to give them. Enter God, the means
that mankind has clung to for purpose. If there isnt a God, does that mean
that 95% of the world is suffering from some sort of mass dillusion? There
may be a thousand arguments against there being a supreme being that we can
think of, but its all those reasons that we cannot think of that allow him to
continue to exist as a necessity in our hearts and minds. True, in the past
Galileo, Copernicus and others have proven that the Church can be wrong —
and I agree. Yet the Church, like humanity, has the right to make a mistake
and reassess their beliefs. It doesnt mean all they say is false, not at all! I couldnt imagine living in a world where God didnt exist — I wouldnt want

Turn around 360 degrees and you are back facing the same direction,
now science lies in front of you where religion so recently resided. Politics,
science, philosophy, theology, technology — its so easy to become confused.
Science is a truth, no matter how adamantly we decree it otherwise. If we
were the center of the universe (as the Bible mandates), if we were all there
was — itd be an awful waste of space. Think about it, what is more
reasonable; that an all-powerful, mysterious God created the universe and
then decided not to give any proof of his existence, OR, that he simply
doesnt exist at all and that we created him so that we wouldnt feel so small
and alone. Proof? What is faith more than a sense of adventure, of risk.
Science strives for reason and truth, hard evidence and fact, and right now we
are merely in a technological adolescence. Bradys argument portrays
science as being purely practical, even profitable. In as sense, doing away
with all pure research. In Inherit the Wind, Drummond replies sarcastically
to this belief of Bradys that “It frightens me to imagine the state of learning
in this world if everyone had your driving curiosity.” After all, what are we
here for? To watch television, drink Coca-Cola and eat McDonalds? No! A
ship in the harbor may be safe, but that is not what a ship is built for. We
must pursue our need for knowledge, and if this means going against any
preconceived notions we fostered in accordance to a God, so be it. To go
forward, we must sacrifice.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

All in all, despite any persuasive contentions either way, Ive fostered
my own belief in the matter. That, as a scientist you can believe in God and
as a devout you can entertain evolution. Forget the book of the Lord or the
book of Darwin, in my book they are two totally separate things. No
scientific theory, including evolution, can pose any threat to evolution — for
these two tools of human understanding are parallels, and not opposites, each
in their own separate realms. Science is simply an inquiry into the facts and
nature of the world, while religion is a search for ethics and morals. They
should be equal, mutually respecting partners, each the master of its own
domain, each vital to human existence in its own way. The whole
controversy over evolution is misguided, for science without it is like
chemistry without the periodic table or history without George Washington.
Accepting evolution isnt rejecting religion. Both can, and should exist in
harmony, and the powers that be should let the individual decide where his
interests may be focused.


I'm Adrienne!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out