Influence Of Realism On Literature

.. ed the modernistic renaissance by employing realistic and naturalistic techniques. Hemingways The Sun Also Rises details the principle of an “alienation from society that had been forced upon by the circumstances of the time” (Spiller 271). In this case, it describes a young boy alienated from society because of his involvement in World War I, the “..loss of faith and hope..”, and “..collapse of former values..” that occurs (Hart 284). His earlier works can sometimes be described as containing “characteristic influences of naturalism” (Bradley 1339). This can be reflected in his “presentation of the strict relations between environment and fate..” (1339). Later in his career, Hemingway once again took the alienation from society route.

This time, in the spirit of realist Henry James, he separates himself from American society to better judge it. With his novel The Rolling Hills of Africa, Hemingway compares American culture to that of another. At times, Hemingway “..began to seem like a little more than a modern realist..” (Spiller Lit His 1300). William Faulkner, producer of some of the most important books of the twentieth-century, also draws the connection between environment and fate strongly. He combines naturalism and primitivism, a literary technique involving clear imagery, to create a sometimes confusing and complex detailed reading that involves “..people of all sorts wealthy and poor, evil and good, slave and free come into sharp focus in his writing.” (“Faulkner” Comptons) This idea, much like that of realist James, provides the reader with the whole picture of society. The novels and short stories of F.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Scott Fitzgerald are famous for portraying the “lost generation” of the post-World War I era. Faulkner’s moral values were “social rather than personal” (“Fitzgerald” Comptons). He believes that his writing should address the problems that society has and the problems that he has with society. Faulkner’s prose is ornate and complex. His sentences are long and complicated, and many nouns and adjectives are used.

Hemingway’s style is quite the opposite. His sentences are short and pointed, and adjectives are used sparingly. The effect is one of great power and compression. By compressing his literary ideas in his writing, he makes his literature easily understood and direct to his readers. Many connections can be made between the literature of the late 19th century realism and naturalism and that of post-World War I modernism. First and most importantly of all, modernists, like realists and naturalists, attacked societys problems by using symbolism to make their own judgments of the basic foundations of American life.

Modernists, such as Ernest Hemingway, looked at American society and compared to that of other cultures of the world. This technique had been extensively employed by such realists as Henry James. Modernism used the naturalist method of scientifically exploring the individual and the society. Stylistically, modernists, with the exception of Hemingway, wrote in a very formal, defined form. Modernists and realists both attacked the moral dilemmas in society.

The only difference was that these dilemmas were different. While that realists attempted to “give a comprehensive picture of modern life..” (502), modernists wished “express the whole experience of modern life.” (Elliott 598). These authors of the realistic and modernistic period had the same goals so naturally they wrote using the same ideas, methods, and principles. Realists focused on different literary aspects to detail how American culture was effected by these changes. They detailed characters shaped by society and tried to convey the good and evil aspects of life. Mirroring this technique, modernists portrayed people alienated and rejected from society because of the effects of the first World War. Both focused on detailing problems facing their characters, externally and internally, while not focusing on plot development. Thematically, both groups of authors conveyed the good and bad aspects of a changing American society.

Both rallied for change and both asked for the unification of society, but both still lingered more on the presence of corruption in America. The only thing that separated the two movements was the societies around them. While both societies were experiencing major change quickly, they were so different. The two literatures had to be distinguished not because of their content and character, which was for the most part the same, but instead because of the differing conditions that existed around the literature. Even though both wanted to accurately depict life, they were written in two very distinct times in American history.

In one, American culture was expanding and adapting. In the other, life was being oppressed by the dehumanizing agents of warfare on a large scale. As we know, culture influences literature. Even though these two literary movements may have only been separated by about twenty years, in these twenty years, focus shifted from the interior of American society to how American society was effected by a conflict created as a result of opposing cultures. This idea of differing cultures produc! ing differing literatures provides the basis for the differences in the movements.

Modernism after World War I was influenced by the realistic/naturalistic movement of the late Nineteenth century. The literary goals, techniques, and principles of the modernists and realists/naturalists were the same. Both wanted to paint an unbiased, accurate picture of society by confronting the problems of the individual and of the society. To do this, most of the time they resorted to the same techniques. They created literature that combined scientific reasoning, unidealistic views, and physical and psychological examination that painted a portrait of society that could be used to help American society adjust, define, and heal. Realists of the late Nineteenth century and modernists of the 1920s wrote alike but were divided on the basis that their respective societies were so different. — Works Cited “American Literature”. Comptons Interactive Encyclopedia (Computer Program) 1995 Bradley, Sculley.

The American Tradition in Literature. New York City: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1967: 1336-1342 Elliott, Emory. Columbia Literary History of the United States. New York City:Columbia University Press:1988, 502-504, 599 “Faulkner, William”. Comptons Interactive Encyclopedia (Computer Program) 1995 “Fitzgerald, Scott F.”. Compton’s Interactive Encyclopedia (Computer Program) 1995 Hart, James D.

The Oxford Companion to American Literature. New York City:Oxford University Press, 1995: 284-285 Pizer, Donald. Realism and Naturalism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1966: 3, 10-11 Spiller, Robert E. The Cycle of American Literature. New York City: The MacMillan Company, 1966: 269-303 Spiller, Robert E. et al. Literary History of the United States.

New York City: The MacMillan Publishing Company, 1974: 1300.