Drug Legalization

Drug Legalization Will the legalization of certain drugs reduce the crime rate in the United States? This question has baffled United States lawmakers, reformists, and citizens alike for so long that many people probably consider it a rhetorical question. With this in mind, I think that the only solution would be to go to the research and see what studies would say about the dilemma. For this particular paper, I found some research that looked at the legalization of marijuana in the United States, and I think for all intensive purposes, it is the best drug to discuss in respect to legalization anyway. To be completely honest, I think that marijuana should be legalized in our country. That is just a personal opinion, that Im sure is shared by the majority of kids that are my age as well.

But, personally I do not use marijuana for medical or medicinal purposes, but at least fifty percent of the people that I associate with do use it so I am familiar with it. One of the reasons that I think it should be legalized is the fact that alcohol is legal. In all of my experiences with the two drugs, I believe that the effects of alcohol definitely outweigh those of marijuana. Lets just say that I would much rather be on the highway with someone who is stoned on pot than to be on the highway with someone that is really drunk. I also think that legalizing marijuana would cause the supply and demand to shift and the price would plummet, alleviating the need of some to rob and kill for enough money to support their habit. I could argue my point for paragraphs, but instead, I will see what research says about it, and who knows, I may change my mind.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The article that I used for this paper came from the June 1998 issue of The Journal of Legal Medicine. It is entitled “Is the debate a Smoke Screen for Movement Toward Legalization.” The author cites in the article an episode of the sitcom Murphy brown, where actress Candice Bergen smokes a joint on national television for medicinal purposes while suffering from breast cancer. The author believes that the nationally televised sitcom endorsed a drug that has not been accepted by the FDA yet and that the event may be a foreshadowing of the future of the drug in our country. In the article, the author posed the same question that we are faced with in this essay? The author believes that before the US legalizes the drug, that they should look at another countrys experiences with crime where the drug is legal. In this particular case, he uses Holland as a comparison.

The statistics that he found were very shocking to me. The author of the article found that: “between 1984 and 1992, marijuana use among males between the ages of 12 and 18 increased by 277 percent.” During this particular time; “shootings increased 40 percent, car thefts increased 62 percent, and hold-ups increased 69 percent.” Whether or not these statistics can be proven to be due to the legalization of marijuana is hard to prove, but they definitely make one think about it. Also in the article, the author reveals that: “75 percent of criminal offenders in the United States believe that they were under some influence of marijuana at the time of the crime, and 7 percent of those who committed homicides believe their actions were directly related to their use of marijuana.” Although there are flaws on both sides of the dispute, one of the strongest points to the anti-legalization movement is the argument that marijuana is a gateway drug which leads to the use of harder, more addictive drugs. In this particular article, the author cites a study in which out of all of the persons studied, “20 percent of persons who use marijuana were three to ten times more likely to go on to use cocaine, and 75 percent of persons who used marijuana 100 or more times later used cocaine.” Another strong argument is that if the US legalizes the drug for medicinal purposes, then it will precipitate the legalization of marijuana on a higher scale, a more recreational scale. So, the only thing that I can conclude is that the legalization of marijuana is a very problematic dilemma that the United States has been faced with for many years.

Both sides have considerable arguments, but there is still so much controversy and gray area that follows the subject. Like most other Americans, I have a lot of difficulty taking either side. I think that the only way to resolve the problem is to continue to research marijuana, its benefits and its dangers, and see which ones outweigh the others. It is then and only then that lawmakers should make their ultimate decision about the fate of the drug in our country. Bibliography Is the Debate a Smoke Screen for Movement Toward Legalization? The Journal of Legal Medicine. June, 1998.

Drug Legalization

Drug Legalization Just say no? This is not exactly the philosophy that the vast majority of the United States population tends to follow. Drugs have become a routine aspect of everyday life in the United States. Neither a gigantic metropolis nor a minute town have gone without feeling the everlasting effects of drugs. Drug use has always posed a major dilemma for America to overcome. The banning of illegal drugs takes many back to the days of the Prohibition problems involving the banishment of alcohol.

Prohibition obviously did not work in the 1920s, and some modern day people feel that making drugs legal would solve the constantly rising drug problem. In his article Facing up to Drugs: Is Legalization the Solution?, Pete Hamill presents both sides of the argument very thoroughly. Using tremendous techniques in both writing and in major points, the author persuades the reader to give a great deal of consideration to the authors belief that legalization is the answer to Americas drug problem. In delivering his points to the reader, Hamill effectively makes good use of internal structure. Initially, the point of view utilized in this article exhibits an interesting way that the reader can personalize himself with the article.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The constant use of I in the article lets the reader know that the author has had first hand experience with the drug issue. The first person point of view also reinforces the fact that this article is completely based on the ideas and beliefs of Hamill. In addition, playing a key role in this article, the audience remains convinced via the effective techniques in writing. In general, this article reaches out to everyone in the United States, and possibly the rest of the world. However, this article targets powerful individuals, and those in the government who can make an impact on the drug world.

This illustrates the whit of Hamill in that he discreetly makes a statement to high ranking officials. Most importantly, the tone in which the author reveals with dignity gives a sense of truthfulness to the reader. The author overall writes seriously, but with a touch of sarcasm here and there. Adding to the seriousness, the authors realistic approach to the situation on drugs tells the reader that the author means every last bit of what he is saying. Although numerous internal writing techniques remain evident, some of the major points that Hamill illustrates in his article prove very effective. First of all, the author states that the war on drugs cannot be won.

It seems an inconceivable task to derail the drug suppliers who plague the street corners in America (514). If the government eliminates one drug cartels base, then the suppliers will just find another location to distribute their goods because of the enormous amount of money involved in drug smuggling (514). These ideas further illustrate how difficult the drug problem is to control. Furthermore, many people wonder what may have happened had alcohol remained banned in the United States. The Prohibition laws, banning the use of alcohol in the 1920s, took away one of Americas most prized possessions (516). It is brilliant for the ideas of Prohibition to be resurrected by Hamill in this instance.

Since drugs are constantly in demand, Hamill believes, as do others, that prohibiting the use of illegal narcotics today poses the same problem that banning the use of alcohol did in the 1920s (516). Lastly, Hamills proposal for legalization gives a reasonable amount of hope for his plan to succeed. The authors plan calls for a ten year experiment in which marijuana, not a hard drug, would be the first drug to be legalized and sold in liquor stores (517). As the years go on, more drugs, harder drugs, would be legalized, and it is estimated that billions of dollars in revenue would be collected as a profit (517). The author gives a thorough outline of his plan which reveals his devotion to making a drastic impact on society.

Internal and external writing tactics, along with major points, make Hamills Facing up to Drugs: Is Legalization the Solution? an extremely persuasive article. Items such as tone and point of view provide for a very powerful argument. Prohibition remains a valid refutation for legalizing drugs in the United States. Evidently, drug use is high in America, and that it will not change anytime soon; therefore, according to Hamill, the demand for drugs can only be dealt with by the legalization of the drugs. The plan that Hamill presents for legalization contains many possibilities that may hold the answer to the drug problem that plagues America. Ultimately, it remains impossible to please everyone, so that makes the decision on the legalization of drugs that much more difficult.

Drug Legalization

Will the legalization of certain drugs reduce the crime rate in the United
States? This question has baffled United States lawmakers, reformists, and
citizens alike for so long that many people probably consider it a rhetorical
question. With this in mind, I think that the only solution would be to go to
the research and see what studies would say about the dilemma. For this
particular paper, I found some research that looked at the legalization of
marijuana in the United States, and I think for all intensive purposes, it is
the best drug to discuss in respect to legalization anyway. To be completely
honest, I think that marijuana should be legalized in our country. That is just
a personal opinion, that Im sure is shared by the majority of kids that are
my age as well. But, personally I do not use marijuana for medical or medicinal
purposes, but at least fifty percent of the people that I associate with do use
it so I am familiar with it. One of the reasons that I think it should be
legalized is the fact that alcohol is legal. In all of my experiences with the
two drugs, I believe that the effects of alcohol definitely outweigh those of
marijuana. Lets just say that I would much rather be on the highway with
someone who is stoned on pot than to be on the highway with someone that is
really drunk. I also think that legalizing marijuana would cause the supply and
demand to shift and the price would plummet, alleviating the need of some to rob
and kill for enough money to support their habit. I could argue my point for
paragraphs, but instead, I will see what research says about it, and who knows,
I may change my mind. The article that I used for this paper came from the June
1998 issue of The Journal of Legal Medicine. It is entitled Is the debate a
Smoke Screen for Movement Toward Legalization. The author cites in the
article an episode of the sitcom Murphy brown, where actress Candice Bergen
smokes a joint on national television for medicinal purposes while suffering
from breast cancer. The author believes that the nationally televised sitcom
endorsed a drug that has not been accepted by the FDA yet and that the event may
be a foreshadowing of the future of the drug in our country. In the article, the
author posed the same question that we are faced with in this essay? The author
believes that before the US legalizes the drug, that they should look at another
countrys experiences with crime where the drug is legal. In this particular
case, he uses Holland as a comparison. The statistics that he found were very
shocking to me. The author of the article found that: between 1984 and 1992,
marijuana use among males between the ages of 12 and 18 increased by 277
percent. During this particular time; shootings increased 40 percent, car
thefts increased 62 percent, and hold-ups increased 69 percent. Whether or
not these statistics can be proven to be due to the legalization of marijuana is
hard to prove, but they definitely make one think about it. Also in the article,
the author reveals that: 75 percent of criminal offenders in the United
States believe that they were under some influence of marijuana at the time of
the crime, and 7 percent of those who committed homicides believe their actions
were directly related to their use of marijuana. Although there are flaws on
both sides of the dispute, one of the strongest points to the anti-legalization
movement is the argument that marijuana is a gateway drug which leads to the use
of harder, more addictive drugs. In this particular article, the author cites a
study in which out of all of the persons studied, 20 percent of persons who
use marijuana were three to ten times more likely to go on to use cocaine, and
75 percent of persons who used marijuana 100 or more times later used
cocaine. Another strong argument is that if the US legalizes the drug for
medicinal purposes, then it will precipitate the legalization of marijuana on a
higher scale, a more recreational scale. So, the only thing that I can conclude
is that the legalization of marijuana is a very problematic dilemma that the
United States has been faced with for many years. Both sides have considerable
arguments, but there is still so much controversy and gray area that follows the
subject. Like most other Americans, I have a lot of difficulty taking either
side. I think that the only way to resolve the problem is to continue to
research marijuana, its benefits and its dangers, and see which ones
outweigh the others. It is then and only then that lawmakers should make their
ultimate decision about the fate of the drug in our country.
Bibliography
Is the Debate a Smoke Screen for Movement Toward Legalization? The Journal of
Legal Medicine. June, 1998
##FOOTER##

x

Hi!
I'm Adrienne!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out