Aids

US Monster
In an extensive article in the Summer-Autumn 1990 issue of “Top
Secret”, Prof J. Segal and Dr. L. Segal outline their theory that AIDS is a
man-made disease, originating at Pentagon bacteriological warfare labs at Fort
Detrick, Maryland. “Top Secret” is the international edition of the
German magazine Geheim and is considered by many to be a sister publication to
the American Covert Action Information Bulletin (CAIB). In fact, Top Secret
carries the Naming Names column, which CAIB is prevented from doing by the
American government, and which names CIA agents in different locations in the
world. The article, named “AIDS: US-Made Monster” and subtitled
“AIDS – its Nature and its Origins,” is lengthy, has a lot of
professional terminology and is dotted with footnotes. AIDS FACTS “The
fatal weakening of the immune system which has given AIDS its name (Acquired
Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome),” write the Segals, “has been traced back
to a destruction or a functional failure of the T4-lymphocytes, also called’helper cells’, which play a regulatory role in the production of antibodies in
the immune system.” In the course of the illness, the number of functional
T4- cells is reduced greatly so that new anti-bodies cannot be produced and the
defenceless patient remains exposed to a range of infections that under other
circumstances would have been harmless. Most AIDS patients die from
opportunistic infections rather than from the AIDS virus itself. The initial
infection is characterized by diarrhea, erysipelas and intermittent fever. An
apparent recovery follows after 2-3 weeks, and in many cases the patient remains
without symptoms and functions normally for years. Occasionally a swelling of
the lymph glands, which does not affect the patient’s well-being, can be
observed. After several years, the pre-AIDS stage, known as ARC (Aids- Related
Complex) sets in. This stage includes disorders in the digestive tract, kidneys
and lungs. In most cases it develops into full-blown AIDS in about a year, at
which point opportunistic illnesses occur. Parallel to this syndrome, disorders
in various organ systems occur, the most severe in the brain, the symptoms of
which range from motoric disorders to severe dementia and death. This set of
symptoms, say the Segals, is identical in every detail with the Visna sickness
which occurs in sheep, mainly in Iceland. (Visna means tiredness in Icelandic).


However, the visna virus is not pathogenic for human beings. The Segals note
that despite the fact that AIDS is transmitted only through sexual intercourse,
blood transfusions and non- sterile hypodermic needles, the infection has spread
dramatically. During the first few years after its discovery, the number of AIDS
patients doubled every six months, and is still doubling every 12 months now
though numerous measures have been taken against it. Based on these figures, it
is estimated that in the US, which had 120,000 cases of AIDS at the end of 1988,
900,000 people will have AIDS or will have died of it by the end of 1991. It is
also estimated that the number of people infected is at least ten times the
number of those suffering from an acute case of AIDS. That in the year 1995
there will be between 10-14 million cases of AIDS and an additional 100 million
people infected, 80 percent of them in the US, while a possible vaccination will
not be available before 1995 by the most optimistic estimates. Even when such
vaccination becomes available, it will not help those already infected. These
and following figures have been reached at by several different mainstream
sources, such as the US Surgeon General and the Chief of the medical services of
the US Army. “AIDS does not merely bring certain dangers with it; it is
clearly a programmed catastrophe for the human race, whose magnitude is
comparable only with that of a nuclear war”, say the Segals. ” They
later explain what they mean by “programmed,” showing that the virus
was produced by humans, namely Dr. Robert Gallo of the Bethesda Cancer Research
Center in Maryland. When proceeding to prove their claims, the Segals are
careful to note that: “We have given preference to the investigative
results of highly renowned laboratories, whose objective contents cannot be
doubted. We must emphasize, in this connection, that we do not know of any
findings that have been published in professional journals that contradict our
hypotheses.” DISCOVERING AIDS The first KNOWN cases of AIDS occurred in New
York in 1979. The first DESCRIBED cases were in California in 1979. The virus
was isolated in Paris in May 1983, taken from a French homosexual who had
returned home ill from a trip to the East Coast of the US. One year later,
Robert Gallo and his co-workers at the Bethesda Cancer Research Center published
their discovery of the same virus, which is cytotoxic. ( i.e poisonous to cells
) Shortly after publishing his discovery, Gallo stated to newspapers that the
virus had developed by a natural process from the Human Adult Leukemia virus,
HTLV-1, which he had previously discovered. However, this claim was not
published in professional publications, and soon after, Alizon and Montagnier,
two researchers of the Pasteur Institute in Paris published charts of HTLV-1 and
HIV, showing that the viruses had basically different structures. They also
declared categorically that they knew of no natural process by which one of
these two forms could have evolved into the other. According to the professional
“science” magazine, the fall 1984 annual meeting of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), was almost entirely devoted
to the question of: to what extent new pathogenic agents could be produced via
human manipulation of genes. According to the Segals, AIDS was practically the
sole topic of discussion. THE AIDS VIRUS The Segals discuss the findings of
Gonda et al, who compared the HIV, visna and other closely-related viruses and
found that the visna virus is the most similar to HIV. The two were, in fact,
60% identical in 1986. According to findings of the Hahn group, the mutation
rate of the HIV virus was about a million times higher than that of similar
viruses, and that on the average a 10% alteration took place every two years.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now


That would mean that in 1984, the difference between HIV and visna would have
been only 30%, in 1982- 20%, 10% in 1980 and zero in 1978. “This
means,” say the Segals, “that at this time visna viruses changed into
HIV, receiving at the same time the ability to become parasites in human
T4-cells and the high genetic instability that is not known in other
retroviruses. This is also consistent with the fact that the first cases of AIDS
appeared about one year later, in the spring of 1979.” “In his
comparison of the genomes of visna and HIV,” add the Segals, “Coffin
hit upon a remarkable feature. The env (envelope) area of the HIV genome, which
encodes the envelope proteins which help the virus to attach itself to the host
cell, is about 300 nucleotides longer than the same area in visna. This
behaviour suggests that an additional piece has been inserted into the genomes
of the visna virus, a piece that alters the envelope proteins and enables them
to bind themselves to the T4-receptors. BUT THIS SECTION BEHAVES LIKE A
BIOLOGICALLY ALIEN BODY, which does not match the rest of the system
biochemically. The above mentioned work by Gonda et al shows that the HIV virus
has a section of about 300 nucleotides, which does not exist in the visna virus.


That length corresponds with what Coffin described. That section is particularly
unstable, which indicates that it is an alien object. According to the Segals,
it “originates in an HTLV-1 genome, (discovered by Gallo-ED) for the
likelihood of an accidental occurrence in HIV of a genome sequence 60% identical
with a section of the HTLV-1 that is 300 nucleotides in length is zero.”
Since the visna virus is incapable of attaching itself to human T4 receptors, it
must have been the transfer of the HTLV-1 genome section which gave visna the
capability to do so. In other words, the addition of HTLV-1 to visna made the
HIV virus. In addition, the high mutation rate of the HIV genome has been
explained by another scientific team, Chandra et al, by the fact that it is
“a combination of two genome parts which are alien to each other BY
ARTIFICIAL MEANS rather than by a natural process of evolution, because this
process would have immediately eliminated, through natural selection, systems
that are so replete with disorders.” “These are the facts of the
case,” say the Segals. “HIV is essentially a visna virus which carries
an additional protein monomer of HTLV-1 that has an epitope capable of bonding
with T4 receptors. Neither Alizon and Montagnier nor any other biologist know of
any natural mechanism that would make it possible for the epitope to be
transferred from HTLV-1 to the visna virus. For this reason we can come to only
one conclusion: that this gene combination arose by artificial means, through
gene manipulation.” THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIV “The construction of a
recombinant virus by means of gene manipulation is extraordinarily expensive,
and it requires a large number of highly qualified personnel, complicated
equipment and expensive high security laboratories. Moreover, the product would
have no commercial value. Who, then,” ask the Segals, “would have
provided the resources for a type of research that was aimed solely at the
production of a new disease that would be deadly to human beings?” The
English sociologist Allistair Hay (as well as Paxman et al in “A Higher
Form of Killing”-ED), published a document whose authenticity has been
confirmed by the US Congress, showing that a representative of the Pentagon
requested in 1969 additional funding for biological warfare research. The
intention was to create, within the next ten years, a new virus that would not
be susceptible to the immune system, so that the afflicted patient would not be
able to develop any defense against it. Ten years later, in the spring of 1979,
the first cases of AIDS appeared in New York. “Thus began a phase of
frantic experimentation,” say the Segals. One group was working on trying
to cause animal pathogens to adapt themselves to life in human beings. This was
done under the cover of searching for a cure for cancer. The race was won by
Gallo, who described his findings in 1975. A year later, Gallo described gene
manipulations he was conducting. In 1980 he published his discovery of HTLV. In
the fall of 1977, a P4 (highest security category of laboratory, in which human
pathogens are subjected to genetic manipulations) laboratory was officially
opened in building 550 of Fort Detrick, MD, the Pentagon’s main biological
warfare research center. “In an article in ‘Der Spiegel’, Prof. Mollings
point out that this type of gene manipulation was still extremely difficult in
1977. One would have had to have a genius as great as Robert Gallo for this
purpose, note the Segals.” Lo and behold. In a supposed compliance with the
international accord banning the research, production and storage of biological
weapons, part of Fort Detrick was “demilitarized” and the virus
section renamed the “Frederick Cancer Research Facility”. It was put
under the direction of the Cancer Research Institute in neighbouring Bethesda,
whose director was no other than Robert Gallo. This happened in 1975, the year
Gallo discovered HTLV. Explaining how the virus escaped, the Segals note that in
the US, biological agents are traditionally tested on prisoners who are
incarcerated for long periods, and who are promised freedom if they survive the
test. However, the initial HIV infection symptoms are mild and followed by a
seemingly healthy patient. “Those who conducted the research must have
concluded that the new virus was…not so virulent that it could be considered
for military use, and the test patients, who had seemingly recovered, were given
their freedom. Most of the patients were professional criminals and New York
City, which is relatively close, offered them a suitable milieu. Moreover, the
patients were exclusively men, many of them having a history of homosexuality
and drug abuse, as is often the case in American prisons. It is understandable
why AIDS broke out precisely in 1979, precisely among men and among drug users,
and precisely in New York City,” assert the Segals. They go on to explain
that whereas in cases of infection by means of sexual contact, incubation
periods are two years and more, while in cases of massive infection via blood
transfusions, as must have been the case with prisoners, incubation periods are
shorter than a year. “Thus, if the new virus was ready at the beginning of
1978 and if the experiments began without too much delay, then the first cases
of full-blown AIDS in 1979 were exactly the resultthat could have been
expected.” In the next three lengthy chapters, the Segals examine other
theories, “legends” as they call them, of the origins of AIDS.


Dissecting each claim, they show that they have no scientific standing,
providing also the findings of other scientists. They also bring up the
arguments of scientists and popular writers who have been at the task of
discounting them as “conspiracy theorists” and show these writers’
shortcomings. Interested readers will have to read the original article to
follow those debates. I will only quote two more paragraphs: “We often
heard the argument that experiments with human volunteers are part of a barbaric
past, and that they would be impossible in the US today… We wish to present
one single document whose authenticity is beyond doubt. An investigative
commission of the US House of Representatives presented in October 1986 a final
report concerning the Manhattan Project. According to this document, between
1945 and 1975 at least 695 American citizens were exposed to dangerous doses of
radioactivity. Some of them were prisoners who had volunteered, but they also
included residents of old-age homes, inmates of insane asylums, handicapped
people in nursing homes, and even normal patients in public hospitals; most of
them were subjected to these experiments without their permission. Thus the’barbaric past’ is not really a thing of the past.” “It is remarkable
that most of these experiments were carried out in university institutes and
federal hospitals, all of which are named in the report. Nonetheless, these
facts remained secret until 1984, and even then a Congressional committee that
was equipped with all the necessary authorization needed two years in order to
bring these facts to life. We are often asked how the work on the AIDS virus
could have been kept secret. Now, experiments performed on a few dozen prisoners
in a laboratory that is subject to military security can be far more easily kept
secret than could be the Manhattan Project.”

Aids

AIDS is a life and death issue. To have the AIDS disease is at present a sentence of slow but inevitable death. I’ve already lost one friend to AIDS. I may soon lose others. My own sexual behavior and that of many of my friends has been profoundly altered by it. In my part of the country, one man in 10 may already be carrying the AIDS virus. While the figures may currently be less in much of the rest of the country, this is changing rapidly. There currently is neither a cure, nor even an effective treatment, and no vaccine either. But there are things that have been PROVEN immensely effective in slowing the spread of this hideously lethal disease. In this essay I hope to present this information. History and
AIDS stands for Acquired Immune Defficiency Disease. It is caused by a virus. The disease originated somewhere in Africa about 20 years ago. There it first appeared as a mysterious ailment afflicting primarily heterosexuals of both sexes. It probably was spread especially fast by primarily female prostitutes there. AIDS has already become a crisis of STAGGERING proportions in parts of Africa. In Zaire, it is estimated that over twenty percent of the adults currently carry the virus. That figure is increasing. And what occurred there will, if no cure is found, most likely occur here among heterosexual folks.

AIDS was first seen as a disease of gay males in this country. This was a result of the fact that gay males in this culture in the days before AIDS had an average of 200 to 400 new sexual contacts per year. This figure was much higher than common practice among heterosexual (straight) men or women. In addition, it turned out that rectal sex was a particularly effective way to transmit the disease, and rectal sex is a common practice among gay males. For these reasons, the disease spread in the gay male population of this country immensely more quickly than in other populations. It became to be thought of as a “gay disease”. Because the disease is spread primarily by exposure of ones blood to infected blood or semen, I.V. drug addicts who shared needles also soon were identified as an affected group. As the AIDS epidemic began to affect increasingly large fractions of those two populations (gay males and IV drug abusers), many of the rest of this society looked on smugly, for both populations tended to be despised by the “mainstream” of society here.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

But AIDS is also spread by heterosexual sex. In addition, it is spread by blood transfusions. New born babies can acquire the disease from infected mothers during pregnancy. Gradually more and more “mainstream” folks got the disease. Most recently, a member of congress died of the disease. Finally, even the national news media began to join in the task of educating the public to the notion that AIDS can affect everyone.

Basic medical research began to provide a few bits of information, and some help. The virus causing the disease was isolated and identified. The AIDS virus turned out to be a very unusual sort of virus. Its genetic material was not DNA, but RNA. When it infected human cells, it had its RNA direct the synthesis of viral DNA. While RNA viruses are not that uncommon, very few RNA viruses reproduce by setting up the flow of information from RNA to DNA. Such reverse or “retro” flow of information does not occur at all in any DNA virus or any other living things. Hence, the virus was said to belong to the rare group of virues called “Retro Viruses”. Research provided the means to test donated blood for the presence of the antibodies to the virus, astronomically reducing the chance of ones getting AIDS from a blood transfusion. This was one of the first real breakthroughs. The same discoveries that allowed us to make our blood bank blood supply far safer also allowed us to be able to tell (in most cases) whether one has been exposed to the AIDS virus using a simple blood test.

When the AIDS virus gets into a person’s body, the results can be broken down into three general types of situations: AIDS disease, ARC, and asymptomatic seropositive condition. The AIDS disease is characterized by having one’s immune system devastated by the AIDS virus. One is said to have the disease if one contracts particular varieties (Pneumocystis, for example) of pneumonia, or one of several particular varieties of otherwise rare cancers (Kaposi’s Sarcoma, for example). This disease is inevitably fatal. Death occurs often after many weeks or months of expensive and painful hospital care. Most folks with the disease can transmit it to others by sexual contact or other exposure of an uninfected person’s blood to the blood or semen of the infected person.

There is also a condition referred to as ARC (“Aids Related Complex”). In this situation, one is infected with the AIDS virus and one’s immune system is compromised, but not so much so that one gets the (ultimately lethal) cancers or pneumonias of the AIDS disease. One tends to be plagued by frequent colds, enlarged lymph nodes, and the like. This condition can go on for years. One is likely to be able to infect others if one has ARC. Unfortunately, all those with ARC are currently felt to eventually progress to getting the full blown AIDS disease.

There are, however, many folks who have NO obvious signs of disease what so ever, but when their blood serum is tested they show positive evidence of having been exposed to the virus. This is on the basis of the fact that antibodies to the AIDS virus are found in their blood. Such “asymptomatic but seropositive” folks may or may not carry enough virus to be infectious. Most sadly, though, current research and experience with the disease would seem to indicate that EVENTUALLY nearly all folks who are seropostive will develop the full blown AIDS disease. There is one ray of hope here: It may in some cases take up to 15 years or more between one’s becoming seropositive for the AIDS virus and one’s developing the disease. Thus, all those millions (soon to be tens and hundreds of millions) who are now seropositive for AIDS are under a sentence of death, but a sentence that may not be carried out for one or two decades in a significan fraction of cases. Medical research holds the possibility of commuting that sentence, or reversing it.

There is one other fact that needs to be mentioned here because it is highly significant in determining recommendations for safe sexual conduct which will be discussed below: Currently, it is felt that after exposure to the virus, most folks will turn seropositive for it (develop a positive blood test for it) within four months. It is currently felt that if you are sexually exposed to a person with AIDS and do not become seropositive within six months after that exposure, you will never become seropositive as a result of that exposure.

Just to confuse the issue a little, there are a few folks whose blood shows NO antibodies to the virus, but from whom live virus has been cultured. Thus, if one is seronegative, it is not absolute proof one is not exposed to the virus. This category of folks is very hard to test for, and currently felt to be quite rare. Some even speculate that such folks may be rare examples of those who are immune to the effects of the virus, but this remains speculation. It is not known if such folks can also transmit the virus.

The AIDS virus is extremely fragile, and is killed by exposure to mild detergents or to chlorox, among other things. AIDS itself may be transmitted by actual virus particles, or by the transmission of living human CELLS that contain AIDS viral DNA already grafted onto the human DNA. Or both. Which of these two mechanisms is the main one is not known as I write this essay. But the fact remains that it is VERY hard to catch AIDS unless one engages in certain specific activities.

Casual contact (shaking hands, hugging, sharing tools) cannot transmit AIDS. Although live virus has been recovered from saliva of AIDS patients, the techniques used to do this involved concentrating the virus to extents many thousands of times greater than occurs in normal human contact, such as kissing (including “deep” or “French” kissing). Thus, there remains no solid evidence that even “deep” kissing can transmit AIDS. Similarly, there is no evidence that sharing food or eating utensils with an AIDS patient can transmit the virus. The same is true for transmission by sneezing or coughing. There just is no current evidence that the disease can be transmitted that way.The same may be true even for BITING,though here there may be some increased (though still remote) chance of transmitting the disease.

The above is very important. It means that there is NO medical reason WHAT SO EVER to recommend that AIDS suffers or AIDS antibody positive folks be quarrantined. Such recommendations are motivated either by ignorance or by sinister desires to set up concentration camps. Combined with the fact that the disease is already well established in this country, the above also means that there is no rational medical basis for immigration laws preventing visits by AIDS suffers or antibody positive persons.

The above also means that friends and family and coworkers of AIDS patients and seropostive persons have nothing to fear from such casual contact. There is no reason to not show your love or concern for a friend with AIDS by embracing the person. Indeed, there appears still to be NO rational basis for excluding AIDS suffers from food preparation activity. Even if an AIDS suffer cuts his or her finger and bleeds into the salad or soup, most of the cells and virus will die, in most cases, before the food is consumed. In addition, it is extremely difficult to get successfully attacked by AIDS via stuff you eat.

AIDS cannot be transmitted by the act of GIVING blood to a blood bank. All equipment used for such blood donation is sterile, and is used just once, and then discarded. Sexual activity is one of the primary ways AIDS is transmitted. AIDS is transmitted particulary by the transmission of blood or semen of an infected person into contact with the blood of an uninfected person. Sex involving penetration of the penis into either the vagina of a woman or the rectum of either a woman or a man has a very high risk of transmitting the disease. It is felt to be about four times MORE likely for an infected male to transmit AIDS to an uninfected woman in the course of vaginal sex than it is likely for an infected woman to transmit AIDS to an uninfected male. This probably relates to the greater area of moist tissue in a woman’s vagina, and to the relative liklihood of microscopic tears to occur in that tissue during sex. But the bottom line is that AIDS can be transmitted in EITHER direction in the case of heterosexual sex. Transmission among lesbians (homosexual females) is rare.

Oral sex is an extremely common form of sexual activity among both gay and straight folks. Such activity involves contact of infected semen or vaginal secretions with the mouth, esophagus (the tube that connects the mouth with the stomach) and the stomach. AIDS virus and infected cells most certainly cannot survive the acid environment of the stomach. Yet, it is still felt that there is a chance of catching the disease by having oral sex with an infected person. The chance is probably a lot smaller than in the case of vaginal or rectal sex, but is still felt to be significant.

As mentioned above, AIDS is also transmitted among intravenous drug users by the sharing of needles. Self righteous attitudes by the political “leaders” of this country at local, state, and national levels have repeatedly prevented the very rational approach of providing free access to sterile intravenous equipment for IV drug users. This measure, when taken promptly in Amsterdam, was proven to greatly and SIGNIFICANTLY slow the spread of the virus in that population. The best that rational medical workers have succeeded in doing here in San Francisco is distribute educational leaflets and cartoons to the I.V. drug abusing population instructing them in the necessity of their rinsing their “works” with chlorox before reusing the same needle in another person. Note that even if you don’t care what happens to I.V. drug abusers, the increase in the number of folks carrying the virus ultimately endangers ALL living persons. Thus, the issue is NOT what you morally think of I.V. drug addicts, but one of what is the most rational way to slow the spread of AIDS in all populations.

Testing of donated blood for AIDS has massivly reduced the chance of catching AIDS from blood transfusions. But a very small risk still remains. To further reduce that risk, efforts have been made to use “autotransfusions” in cases of “elective surgery” (surgery that can be planned months in advance). Autotransfusion involves the patient storing their own blood a couple of weeks prior to their own surgery, to be used during the surgery if needed. Similary, setting up donations of blood from friends and family known to be antibody negative and at low risk for AIDS prior to schedualed surgery further can decrease the already small risks from transfusion.

The “sexual revolution” of the 1960’s has been stopped dead in its tracks by the AIDS epidemic. The danger of contracting AIDS is so real now that it has massively affected the behavior of both gay and straight folks who formerly had elected to lead an active sexual life that included numerous new sexual contacts. The safest option regarding AIDS and sex is total abstinence from all sexual contact. For those who prefer to indulge in sexual contact, this is often far too great a sacrifice. But it IS an option to be considered.

For those who wish to have sexual contact with folks on a relatively casual basis, there have been devised rules for “safe sex”. These rules are very strict, and will be found quite objectionable by most of us who have previously enjoyed unrestricted sex. But to violate these rules is to risk unusually horrible death. Once one gets used to them, tho, the rule for “safe sex” do allow for quite acceptable sexual enjoyment in most cases.

For those who wish to indulge in pentration of the vagina or rectum by a penis: The penis MUST be sheathed in a condom or “rubber”. This must be done “religiously”, and NO exceptions are allowed. A condom must be used by a man even when he is receiving oral sex. Cunnilingus (oral stimulation of a womans gentitals by the mouth of a lover) is NOT considerd to be safe sex. Safe sex includes mutual masturbation, and the stimultion of one genitals by another’s hand (provided there are no cuts in the skin on that hand). But manual stimulation of another’s genitals is NOT safe if one has cuts on one’s hands, unless one is wearing a glove.

Note that even when one is conscientiously following the recommendations for safe sex, accidents can happen. Condoms can break. One may have small cuts or tears in ones skin that one is unaware of. Thus, following rules for “safe sex” does NOT guarantee that one will not get AIDS. It does, however, greatly reduce the chances. There are many examples of sexaully active couples where one member has AIDS disease and the other remains seronegative even after many months of safe sex with the diseased person. It is particularly encouraging to note that, due to education programs among San Francisco gay males, the incidence of new cases of AIDS infection among that high risk group has dropped massively. Between practice of safe sex and a significant reduction in the number of casual sexual contacts, the spread of AIDS is being massively slowed in that group. Similar responsible action MUST be taken by straight folks to further slow the spread of AIDS, to give our researchers time to find the means to fight it.

For those who would have sexual activity, the safest approach in this age of AIDS is monogamous sex. Specifically, both parties in a couple must commit themselves to not having sex with anyone else. At that time they should take AIDS antibody tests. If the tests are negative for both, they must practice safe sex until both members of the couple have been greater than six months since sexual contact with anyone else. At that time the AIDS blood test is repeated. If both tests remain negative six months after one’s last sexual contact with any other party, current feeling is that it is now safe to have “unprotected” sex. Note that this approach is recommended especially for those who wish to have children, to prevent the chance of having a child be born infected with AIDS, getting it from an infected mother. Note also that this approach can be used by groups of three or more people, but it must be adhered to VERY strictly.

Unscrupulous folks have begun to sell the idea that one should pay to take an AIDS antibody test, then carry an ID card that certifies one as AIDS antibody negative, as a ticket to being acceptable in a singles bar. This is criminal greed and stupidity. First, one can turn antibody positive at any time. Even WEEKLY testing will not pick this change up soon enough to prevent folks certified as “negative” from turning positive between tests. Much worse, such cards are either directly or implicitly promoted as a SUBSTITUTE for “safe sex” practices. This can only hasten the spread of the disease.

If you want to learn your antibody status, be sure to do so ANONYMOUSLY. Do NOT get the test done by any agency that requires your real name, address, or any other identifying information. Fortunately, in San Francisco, there is a public place to get AIDS antibody testing where you may identify yourself only as a number. Tho that place has a three month long waiting list for testing, there are other private clinics where one may have the test done for cash, and may leave any false name one wishes. The reason I suggest this is that currently there are some very inappropriate reactions by government and business to folks known to be antibody positive. Protect yourself from such potential persection by preventing your antibody status from being a matter of record. That information is for you, your lover(s), and (if need be) your physician. And for NO one else.

There currently is NO treatment for AIDS (this includes AZT) that shows significant promise. It is my own strongly held view, and that of the medical and research community world wide, that the AIDS epidemic is a serious problem, with the potential to become the worst plague this species has ever known. This is SERIOUS business. VASTLY greater sums should be spent on searching for treatments and vaccines. On the other hand, we feel strongly that this is “merely” a disease, not an act by a supernatural power. And while it does not seem likely we will find either a cure or a vaccine in the forseeable future, it may be that truly effective treatments that can indefinitely prolong the life of AIDS victims may be found in the next few years. When science and technology do finally fully conquer AIDS, we can go back to deciding what sort and how much sex to have with who ever we choose on the basis of our own personal choice, and not by the coercion of a speck of proteins and RNA. May that time come soon. In the mean time, we must all do what we can to slow the spread of this killer. This article is intended to help accomplish that. Please circulate it as widely as possible.


Words
/ Pages : 3,481 / 24

x

Hi!
I'm Adrienne!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out