Abortion gives the mother an option not to have a baby if she doesn’t chooses not to haveone. In some cases, abortions can save the life of the mother.

Poor families greatly benefit fromabortions. For those still in school, abortions give teenagers a normal life, and would help themsucceed in school. These are reasons why abortions are good for the American Society. Abortions can save the life of the woman because a baby could cause a great health riskto the mother. This risk involves death, or permanent damage to the female. An abortion shouldbe performed at this point because the death of a fetus is better than the death of the mother. Awoman is a full person, while the fetus is not. Once the fetus has been removed, and there’s nomore risk to the mother.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Then, she can try an have another baby if she wishes.Poor women are more likely to have more abortions than that of the middle, or upperclass. Poor women don’t have the financial means to take care of the child, therefore abortionswould help them. Also, a lot of the poor women already have children to take of, and addingone more would greatly burden the already financially troubled parent.

Again, allowing them tohave an abortion would help them. Once the fetus has been aborted, then the parents canconcentrate on their other children.Teenagers are more affected by having a baby these days than it would have been 100years ago.

There are more responsibilities for the average teenager, they have to study, work,and go to school for an entire day. This leaves almost no time to take care of a child. Also, theteenager would have to most likely support the child by herself. This alone is a greaterresponsibility than anything in her life. All her time would be put into taking care of the child,that she would have almost no time to study. The consequence of this is the teen dropping out ofschool, and not even getting a high school diploma or finishing her year in college. Without ahigh school diploma, the likeliness of the teen finding a job that offers other than minimum wageis slim. This could mean that she is almost living in poverty, and barely making it on her own.

Let’s now consider that the father of the child is helping with the duties that come along with ababy. He would most likely be working minimum wage just trying to make ends meet. If he stillattended school, than he would probably be getting poor grades. Then he would stuck in thesame situation as the mother. Teenagers just don’t have the time or financial resources to carefor a child. Even if they receive welfare, that’s really not enough to pay for the childSince teens are going to have sex anyways, then they should be taught about it. Mostschools do offer sex education programs to the students. Sex education is good because itteaches teens about sex, along with how to be safe.

The class can also teach the teenagers aboutthe consequences of having sex, or unsafe sex. Teaching students about sex can reduce the rateof unwanted pregnancy’s and reduce the chances of acquiring a sexually transmitted disease. Inthese programs, using a condom is taught, and alternatives to it are discussed. But, the best waynot to get pregnant, is to not have sex at all. If the mother was in grave danger from the unborn child, than I don’t think there’sanyway that the baby can be saved. Leaving the fetus in the mother could complicate the healthof the mother. Her reproductive system could get damaged, and she could even die. If the babywere to get aborted, then she could try to have another one if she is ready.

Even though poor women are more likely to get abortions, they don’t necessarily need tohave them done. There are other alternatives for the pregnant woman to turn to. They can givethe baby up for adoption, or they can have the baby and go on welfare until they find a job. But,since the parents are poor, then it might be hard for them to even pay for the medical bills.

Teenagers have many options that they could turn to. If the parents were willing, thenthey could take care of the child while their teen attended school. The mother of the could opt togive the baby up for adoption. This is a good alternative because it doesn’t leave anyresponsibilities to the teen. Plus the baby would be given to a couple that really wants to beparents.In conclusion, abortion is good because poor women probably can’t afford a child. So,an abortion would be good for them. An abortion can help save the mother from harm, andpossible death.

It could allow a teenager to carry on with her normal life, without dealing withthe hardships of taking care of a baby.


Abortion Abortion is one of the most controversial issues discussed in todays society. This issue has caused a great deal of turmoil in the world. Some protestors have even killed other human beings over the issue. Peoples religion has had some input on this issue, but this should not be the only factor when looking at this serious controversial debate.

There are many questions that one must ask him or herself when deciding to be either for or against abortion.In this position paper I am going to talk about some issues that may not be black and white. My position on this issue is against abortion, and I am going to attempt to show that. Abortion is wrong in many instances. It is wrong anytime except in the case of a dying mother, incest or rape. It is wrong because people choose to have sex.They know the consequences before they had sex.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

For example, a person is playing Russian Roulette. This person knows that there is a possibility that they may die from this. In the case of pregnancy, the people that choose to have sex, they know that there is a chance at getting pregnant. The people that have an abortion when they have become pregnant by there own choice, not by incest, rape or threatening the mothers life, are using it as a birth control method, which is wrong.One of the major issues is determining whether or not the fetus is a person, and if so, when? My view is that it becomes a person at the time of conception. At that specific time, it has 46 chromosomes and is determined whether or not is it going to be a boy or girl. Furthermore, all other characteristics are decided at that moment.

One of the issues discussed in class was the time of conception. A point mentioned in class was that any time a sperm or egg was destroyed or killed, then abortion was occurring, for example, masturbation or menstruation. The point that is trying to be made is that if killing the fetus at conception is wrong, which has potential to be a person, then killing the things that have potential to become a person, like sperm and eggs, is wrong also.I do not agree with this point.

My reasoning is the sperm or egg does not have all 46 chromosomes, it has only half. Half of the chromosomes does not make a person. Alone, the sperm or egg cannot become a person, but at the time of conception it is possible. I cannot sufficiently rebut the idea of the potentiality of the sperm or egg.I do understand that these both have the potential to become a person. A point related to the previous one is the use of contraceptives. The use of contraceptives brings up the issue of why arent these as wrong as an abortion.

This raises again the idea of the potentiality of a person. As I previously mentioned, I do not see something with half of the chromosomes needed to become a human, a human. John Noonan says that the fetus is a person, therefore it is wrong to kill it.The problem with this is that all people do not believe a fetus is a person, therefore it is okay to kill it. For example, Mary Anne Warren does not believe the fetus is a person. She thinks that there are certain traits or characteristics that an organism must have in order to be characterized as a person. These are: (1) “consciousness (of objects and events external and /or internal to the being), and in particular the capacity to feel pain; (2) reasoning (the developed capacity to solve new and relatively complex problems); (3) self motivated activity (activity which is relatively independent of either genetic of direct external control); (4) the capacity to communicate, by whatever means, messages of an indefinite variety of types, that is, not just with an indefinite number of possible contents, but on indefinitely many possible topics; (5) the presence of self-concepts, and self awareness, either individual or racial, or both.

” The problem with these traits as determining the time at which a fetus becomes a person is that these traits describe things that are not just human, but also children that are two and three years of age. For instance, these characteristics say that a new born baby that is alive and breathing on its own, is not a person and therefore it is okay to kill it.This seems highly ludicrous to say that a new born baby is not a person. Also, as I said before, these traits include other things than the species Homosapiens. I am referring to the monkeys, chimpanzees or gorillas.

I do not see these animals as humans, even though many scientists believe that we evolved from monkey or chimps. There is also evidence of monkeys or chimps speaking to other humans. This is a whole other issue.

Regardless of whether or not these chimps are our ancestors, which I believe not to be these characteristics may also characterize other organisms to be humans. Another issue raised is who has more right to life or right to choose, the mother or the potential baby. I have no complete feeling about this issue because I have not researched it enough to come to an educated decision. I do lean toward the right of a fetus. I can see the oppositions view though.

Why should some potential human being be able to tell me or anyone else what to do? I do think that they should have some say in there own life. Although, in the case of a mother dying if she continues on with the pregnancy, I do not see a problem with terminating the pregnancy. I do believe that they should explore all the options first.


Abortion Abortion is the ending of pregnancy before birth and is morally wrong. An abortion results in the death of an embryo or a foetus. Abortion destroys the lives of helpless, innocent children and illegal in many countries. By aborting these unborn infants, humans are hurting themselves; they are not allowing themselves to meet these new identities and unique personalities. Abortion is very simply wrong. Everyone is raised knowing the difference between right and wrong. Murder is wrong, so why is not abortion? People argue that it is not murder if the child is unborn.Abortion is murder since the foetus being destroyed is living, breathing and moving.

Why is it that if an infant is destroyed a month before the birth, there is no problem, but if killed a month after birth, this is inhumane murder? It is morally and strategically foolish, because we lose the middle when we talk about reproductive rights without reference to a larger moral and spiritual dimension, and we are unwilling to use language like transgression and redemption, or right and wrong. -Wolf p54 The main purpose abortions are immoral is how they are so viciously done. Everyday, innocent, harmless foetuses that could soon be laughing children are being brutally destroyed. One form of abortion is to cut the foetus into pieces with serrated forceps before being removed, piece by piece from the uterus by suction with a vacuum aspirator. Another form consists of bringing the foetus feet first into the birth canal, puncturing its skull with a sharp instrument and sucking out the brain tissue.The body parts, such as the head, are given letters, rather than refer to the parts as what they are. In my opinion this is for the doctors who cannot face the reality of what they are doing.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The remains of the foetus or embryo, as the case may be, are put into everyday, plastic buckets and then sent to a dumpster where these precious bones and limbs are disposed. However, how and when an abortion takes place are matters of little importance to pro- abortionists and other defenders. Even former abortion practitioners from varying backgrounds and religions have a new view on abortion.These changes of heart were caused by psychological, religious and scientific reasons. One doctor, Dr.

Bernard Nathanson, performed 60,000 abortions and supervised 10,000, before scientific evidence and the use of an ultrasound, convinced him he was promoting and participating what he now calls the most atrocious holocaust in the history of the United States. Other doctors refuse to perform legal abortions, saying they should save lives rather than destroy them. Many argue is it the women’s or the foetus’ rights and values that are being trampled on? Pro-choice movements sometimes fall back on an abortion rhetoric that seems to dehumanize and trivialize the death of a foetus as a way to humanize and make important the reproductive rights of women. (Wolf p54) Women can treat an unwanted foetus as a violation of her civil rights and is therefor justified tin using force to expel it (McMillan pA12) The decision is not up to the mother because she is not God.Only God, the ultimate creator has the right to choose who may live and who shall die.

Humans do not have the right or the power to control the quality of life and to avoid suffering. The issue of abortion is not just life, but how life is created and the extent to which human intention and control the process, both before and after birth. All humans inventions and interventions may give us a world to regret.

(Clark p3) With abortion, we humans give ourselves dominion over a large part of God’s plans and our destiny.Abortion becomes especially evil when the bond between mother and child is broken and it is being used as an alternative birth control when humans cannot control their irresponsible sexual hungers. If beings are responsible enough to be sexually active, they should also be responsible enough to accept consequences, and if that means becoming pregnant and creating a life, then that life should have the opportunity to live.

There should be a bond or relationship between a mother and child, whether born or unborn. Mothers and her children form a bond unlike any other felling of love; when a child is aborted, before given the right to grow in the bond, does the mother feel the connection with her child or is it just uterine material. Abortion is never about just abortion. It is about questions like whether the society at large, or individual pieces of it, regards the fact of women’s fertility as burden or gift, and how they treat it, and what are the incentives ad disincentives they provide? How the rearing of children is regarded – benefit or burden, or sometimes a balance of those, and who is responsible for that? And then one of the deepest things, at the core of what abortion is about, is what is our understanding of freedom? Is freedom something like will: the ability to choose something in anyway you choose, freedom without regard to truth, to what some would call natural law? Freedom without regard to the common good? -Alvare p54 Many women do feel this bond and also feel a great loss and emptiness in their lives. Several women have confided in one author, Naomi Wolf.They have come to her in grief. One woman shared that each year she lights a candle for the foetus that she aborted, and that she feels like there is no room within the organized reproductive rights institutions or within mainstream feminism to articulate that grief and make it meaningful. All humans have the same right to live compared to other humans; whether rich, poor, majority or minority this being deserves the same chance we were all given.

(Clark p3) The Vatican teaches that all humans have a right to life, from the moment of conception until the natural ordained moment of death. According to the Catholic church, a person is living when as young as an embryo, which refers to an organism at its early stage of development, through the foetus stage, which is from the end of the eighth week until birth and when considered a baby, until the last second of life before death. It is also selfish to abort an unborn child.This aborted child could have been destined to create world peace, make the invention of the century, find a cure foe AIDS or other diseases or maybe have children of his or her own and continue our human race. Pro-choice defenders feel that the Roman Catholic Church’s opinion leaves no room for human reason as it instead tries to unrealistically legislate an uncompromising pro-life policy.

There is no excuse for having an abortion. Pro-choice followers recommend abortion if the child is a result of rape, a painful reminder, may be born defected or the female is too young and not ready to raise a child of her own and be a parent. If these are the cases, adoption agencies are found nationwide and willingly accept unwanted children giving them the opportunity to live with another family.There are many different viewpoints on abortion in the United States of America.

Where most Americans do not feel that abortion is necessarily ‘good,’ they do believe it is a ‘right.’ Others have similar opinions. They embrace contradictory opinions and consider abortion a form of murder and yet still feel it should be legal for the truly desperate.

However, most Americans think abortions are morally troubling. A recent study by George Hunt shows that neither age nor gender appears to have any effect on people’s current views on abortions. Today, teenagers are getting mixed messages from parents, peers, and media. This is the reason for the increased birth rate.Abortion is being used as a method of birth control in this case which shows in a study in The Lancet magazine that 24.

1% of teenagers aged seventeen through nineteen have undergone induced abortion. As the world grows with the new times we must look at these such important issues that will dramatically effect us soon enough in the future. Sixty million abortions are done yearly, and that number only increases as more and more countries legalize this brutal destroying of innocent children who could be successful world leaders. What does it mean to choose life? Who chooses life? Where should the focus be on choosing life? (Wilson p54) To choose life not only means to speak out against unnecessary death of humans but also to take care of one’s self, support the good mannerisms of all and to see good in all. The only being who has a say of life is God Almighty himself.However, we all have the opportunity and power to choose to live. The focus on choosing life should be on being happy.

A complete life is a fulfilling and very satisfying life. It is up to us only to decide and teach others of these brutal acts done daily out of the laziness, irresponsibility, and ignorance of humans in attempt to escape from real life. Human life can not run forever and eventually, they will learn that destroying the innocent is wrong.Pro- life movement will win, because when you hold up a picture of a six month old foetus being stabbed in the neck and all you say is ‘choice, choice, choice’ you are going to loose. (Wolf p54) Bibliography Alvare, Helen, Wilson, Marle, Wolf, Naomi. Abortion: Whose Values? Whose Rights? Tikkun January-February 1997: pp54-60 Clark, Thomas. Thou Shalt Not Play God The Humanist July-August 1995: p3 Hunt, George W. Of Many Things America 31 January 1998: p2 Lavelle, Marianne.

When Abortion Comes Late In Pregnancy, Though Rare, Most Aren’t For Medical Reasons U.S. News and World Reports 19 January 1998: p31-32 Lefevere, Patricia.

Ex-abortion Providers; Conversation Tales National Catholic Reporter 16 January 1998: p6 Merril, Ted. Abortion; Extreme Views Ignore Reality Medical Economics 15 July 1996: p33 McMillan, Jeff. Focusing On a Woman’s Right To Self Defense The Chronicle of Higher Education.

6 December 1996: pA12 No Easy Quick Fix Solutions To Abortion Issues National Catholic Reporter 8 November 1996: p20 Reproductive Tract Infections and Abortion Among Adolescent Girls In Rural Nigeria The Lancet 4 February 1995: p300 Thomas, Judy. Pro-life Turns Deadly Newsweek 26 January 1998: p64 Wallace, Bruce.When One Fetus Lives and One Dies Maclean’s 19 August 1996:.


Abortion is an extremely complex and highly debated public issue that has consumed much of the American social and political arena in the late twentieth century. People on both sides of the debate present strong arguments that establish valid points. Society clearly states that child abuse and the murder of ones child is illegal, but does allow abortion.

Regardless of whether it is right or wrong, the fine line that exists between abortion and murder will be discussed and debated for decades to come.In Judith Thomsons article, “A Defense of Abortion,” she argues that abortion can be morally justified in some instances, but not all cases. Clearly, in her article, Thomson argues, “while I do argue that abortion is not impermissible, I do not argue that is always permissible” (163). Thomson feels that when a woman has been impregnated due to rape, and when a pregnancy threatens the life of a mother, abortion is morally justifiable.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

In order to help readers understand some of the moral dilemmas raised by abortion, Thomson creates numerous stories that possess many of the same problems.Thomson begins her argument by questioning the validity of the argument proposed by anti-abortion activists. Thomson explains that “most opposition to abortion relies on the premise that the fetus is a human being.from the moment of conception” (153). Thomson thinks this is a premise that is strongly argued for, although she also feels it is argued for “not well” (153). According to Thomson, anti-abortion proponents argue that fetuses are persons, and since all persons have a right to life, fetuses also posses a right to life. Regardless, Thomson argues that one can grant that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception, with a right to life, and still prove that abortion can be morally justified. In order to prove this argument Thomson proposes the example of “the sick violinist.

“According to this story, Thomson explains, imagine that one morning you wake up and find yourself in bed surgically attached to a famous unconscious violinist. The violinist has a fatal kidney ailment, and your blood type is the only kind that matches that of the violinist. You have been kidnapped by music lovers and surgically attached to the violinist. If you remove yourself from the violinist, he will die, but the good news is that he only requires nine months to recover.

Obviously, Thomson is attempting to create a situation that parallels a woman who has unintentionally become pregnant from a situation such as rape. Thomson has created a situation in which in which an individuals rights have been violated against their will. Although not the two situations are not identical, a fetus and a medically-dependent violinist are similar situations for Thomson. In both cases, a person has unwillingly been made responsible for another life. The question Thomson raises for both situations is, “Is it morally incumbent on you to accede to this situation?” (154). Most individuals would find the situation ludicrous and feel little, or no, obligation to the sick violinist. But, Thomson points out, one may use this example to illustrate how an individuals right to life does not mean other individuals are morally responsible for that life. Remember, Thomson explains, anti-abortion activists argue that all persons have a right to life, and violinists are persons (154).

Granted an individual has a right to decide what happens in and to their body, Thomson continues, but as anti-abortion activists argue, a persons right to life outweighs your right to decide what happens in and out of your body (154). Therefore, you are obligated to care for the sick violinist. Yet, most people would find this obligation completely ridiculous, which proves to Thomson that there is something wrong with the logic of the anti-abortionists argument. Thus, Thomson concludes that an individual does have the right to decide what happens to their own body, especially when pregnancy has resulted against a persons will (rape) and in a manner that violates her rights.Another story that Thomson utilizes to address the abortion debate is the “people seeds” example. According to this story, one is to imagine that there are “people-seeds” flying around in the air like pollen. An individual desires to open their windows to allow fresh air into their house, yet he/she buys the best mesh screens available because he/she does not want any of the people seeds to get into their house. Unfortunately, there is a defect in one of the screens, and a seed takes root in their carpet anyway.

Thomson argues that under these circumstances, the person that is developing from the people seed does not have a right to develop in your house. She also argues that “despite the fact that you opened your windows” the seed still does not have a right to develop in your house (159). Thomson is drawing a parallel to a woman who accidentally becomes pregnant despite using contraception. Like the person who got the people seed in their house, despite using precautions, the woman is not obligated to bear a child. The woman clearly used contraception and tried to prevent pregnancy, and is not obligated to bear this child in her body.

Thomson thinks that, under these circumstances, abortion is definitely permissible.Finally, Thomson tells another tale to illustrate an answer to some of the questions raised by the abortion debate. Thomson asks the reader to imagine a situation in which she was extremely ill and was going to die unless Henry Fonda came and placed his cool hand on her brow.

Yet, Thomson points out, Fonda is not obligated to visit her and heal her. It would be “nice” of him to visit her and save her life, but he is not morally obligated to do so. This, for Thomson, is similar to the dilemma faced by the woman who has become pregnant, but does not want to keep her baby. Thomson feels it would be “nice” for the woman to bear the child, but no one can force her to do so.

Just like Henry Fonda must choose whether or not he wants to save Thomsons life, the mother has the right to choose whether or not she wants to give birth to the baby. Pregnancy is a condition that affects the womans body and, therefore, the woman has the right to decide whether or not she wants to have a baby.Although I agree with many of Thomsons arguments, there are a few aspects of her argument that I feel are not correct. First, Thomson states that if two people try very hard not get pregnant, they do not have a “special responsibility” for the conception.

I completely disagree and think that two mature individuals have to be held responsible for the results of sexual intercourse. The couple engaged in an act that is understood to have significant consequences, and the couple has to be held responsible for the products of intercourse. Furthermore, if a couple had engaged in sexual intercourse and both contracted a sexually transmitted disease, both people would be held responsible for their actions. Thus, I feel a woman possesses the right to decide whether or not she wants to bear a child, but I do think individuals have to realize that they are responsible for the results of a serious act like sexual intercourse.

However, Thomson does respond to this criticism of the people seed argument by offering asking the question, “Is it realistic for a woman to get a hysterectomy, so she never has to worry about becoming pregnant due to rape, failed contraception, etc.?” Obviously, there is some logical merit to this response, but I do not think it appropriately addresses the real issue of “special responsibility.” For example, imagine a young boy who gets very hungry for dinner. Yet his mother has had a hard day at work and taking a nap upstairs.

His father hasnt come home from work yet either, so the boy decides to heat himself up some soup. He knows he is too young to use the stove, so he decides to use the microwave which is much safer. In fact, he even uses potholders when he takes the hot bowl out of the microwave because he does not want to burn himself.

But, as he walks into the living room to watch television, he slips spills the hot soup on his arm and breaks the bowl on the floor. Now, even though the boy took “reasonable precautions” he still is at least partly responsible for his mistake. He took many “reasonable precautions” to avoid hurting himself, but, in the end, he still accidentally hurt himself. This situation exactly parallels a woman who has used contraception and still gotten pregnant. The woman tried not get pregnant, but accidents happen.

Thus, the little boy has to be held partly responsible for burning himself because he chose to cook himself hot soup. Similarly, the female has to be held partially responsible if she gets pregnant even if she used contraception because she, like the boy, put herself in a risky situation.In conclusion, Judith Thomson raises numerous, strong arguments for the permissibility of abortion. Overall, she argues that the woman has the right to decide whether or not to have an abortion because the woman has the right to decide what happens to her body.

Still, in closing, Thomson interestingly notes, “I agree that the desire for the childs death is not one which anybody may gratify, should it turn out possible to detach the child alive” (163). Words/ Pages : 1,587 / 24


I am against because, I think abortion is the wrong thing to do. It is considered murder in my opinion and this should result in some kind of penalty or something should happen.Abortion should’ve never been introduced in this world. I think that it is another way of killing someone. At that stage of killing a newborn child, is not giving the baby a chance to live their life and to live in this world.

The baby doesn’t even get a chance to open its eyes and to live long enough to know and understand the meaning of life. I think abortion I really uncalled for. In my opinion the definition of abortion is murder and death for no reason. An is what is basically happening in this world today.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

As I speak there are young women and men making this decision to have an abortion.Abortion shouldn’t be occur because, you never know what kind of potential your son or daughter might have. Anyone’s baby could be the next Michael Jordan, Whitney Houston, or any other athletes or famous stars.

An most of the time when a baby is born they are born with some kind of talent. An some people have the potential to do something real good with their lives. So people shouldn’t throw talent, human being, and some gifted babies in the trash.I think that if any girl or boy can’t handle raising a child, then the best thing for them to do is to not have sex at all or wait intil they are married. Then the next best thing to do is to talk to Someone that you feel comfortable with about the situation. An I think the last thing to do is to give the baby up for adoption.

An that would still be making a good decision because the baby is still going to have a better life then it would with the real parants or parent. An sometimes that is the best thing to do, because some mothers in this world don’t have enough money to support They’re own selves. So there are times when adoption works a lot better then just keeping the baby.

The worst thing to do is to kill the poor, innocent, baby, who has no chance to live.Psychology Essays


AbortionAbortion has always been a controversial subject among everybody whether they are involved directly or indirectly, whether they are for it or against it. It is nearly impossible to find someone who doesnat have an opinion about abortion. Both those who favor or oppose abortion make superior arguments to defend their beliefs and views. Personally, I think every last person is entitled to his or her own opinions, beliefs, thoughts, and rights. And yes, women have rights too, and denying women the right to choose abortion in the early stages of fetal development is denying her rights as a US citizen and is also discriminating against her.

I think that abortion should be restricted to the first 21 weeks, which is when most of the tests can be taken to determine the health of the fetus. Anything after that might be immoral, since the fetus can very well live outside the motheras womb; although, it does depend on the situation. Abortion should unquestionably not be used as a primary birth control use.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

It should be determined based on the circumstances of the pregnancy. A woman should have the choice to have an abortion if she is raped, impregnated by a disturbed man or by incest. It would be unfair to force a rape victim to bear an unwanted baby and give up all the dreams she ever had and be reminded of that rape for the rest of her life.

I also think a womanas life should not be sacrificed or put at risk, a woman should be able to abort if there is any complications or a risk to her life and a threat to the babyas life. It would be morally wrong to bring to this world a severely deformed, extremely handicapped, or an incompetent baby and watch him or her suffer for the rest of their lives. That would not only affect the motheras life, but that would affect the babyas life also. That child would never be average, never be happy and would feel sad for not being like the other children. It takes so much energy, will power, dedication, prayers and money to take care of an ill-fated baby and that is why they commonly end up in institutions regardless of how much they are loved. And the worse thing is there is not much they can achieve in their lives. What kind of life would that baby have if the mother passes away while in labor or delivering? There is only so much a father can do.

How fair would that be? If the woman is not prepared financially, emotionally and physically, she should have the choice; every child should be wanted. After all, there are enough children out there that are either on welfare, foster care or abused. They might also feel rejected by society, by their parents who did not want them in the first place, and might rebel later on in their teen years. Pro-life wants abortion to become illegal; they think that itas murder.

They say the baby is innocent, did nothing to deserve being killed, did not ask to be born and has the right to live. Which is understandable and logical but the fetus has no feelings or memories, it is just a mass of tissues at first. But think about the result, think about the future of that baby, she or he does not deserve to live in melancholy, in poverty and abuse, she or he might be resented later on, might have a ghastly life with terrible parents that do not care and can not afford raising them. Pro-life wants to pass ahuman life amendmenta to the constitution declaring the unborn fetus to be a full person from the moment of conception. A womanas body has the ability to abort naturally by the way of miscarriage. Natural abortions are happening everyday.

Does that mean woman are going to be questioned about the circumstances of the miscarriage, are they going to be investigated or liable or even prosecuted? Who is going to be held accountable for the death of that fetus? Where do we draw the line? Pro-life promotes adoption, which is a very good way to give a baby a better life and a better future. But it is a lot harder to give up a newborn than it is to abort it. All mothers can assure you that. Woman get attached to the baby during the pregnancy and do not care any more about giving up the baby even if they can not afford to take care of it, therefore adoption is not an option anymore. They will always want to keep the baby. Not only that but according to statistics, there is a two to four year wait for an adoption and could cost as much as $10,000 to $15,000. Not a lot of people can afford that.

In my opinion, abortion should definitely be the motheras choice with some restrictions of course. Do not exceed the first 21 weeks. Mothers are competent of making their own decisions. Nevertheless, it is their constitutional right and they are the oneas who are going to live with the outcome or guilt.

It should be between the mother, her religion, her conscious, and her morality. Nobody has the right to impose his or her morals on anybody. Sometimes abortion is a way out of misery not just for the mother but for the baby, too.


AbortionAbortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politician’s views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person.

Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother.

Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome).Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion.They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection.Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare.

Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973.

The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman’s health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman’s health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal.

I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it.There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one.

If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make.


I'm Adrienne!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out